Toronto Star

Blair met with mixed feelings at last meeting

Carding dominates discussion as chief wraps up term

- WENDY GILLIS STAFF REPORTER

Nearly 10 years to the day he was named police chief, Bill Blair attended his final board meeting amidst praise, condemnati­on and controvers­y.

Thursday’s packed meeting at Toronto Police headquarte­rs followed a similar pattern establishe­d in recent months: citizen after citizen taking the mic and urging board members not to pass the divisive revised community engagement, or “carding” policy — or, better yet, eliminate the practice altogether.

“Put the whole thing aside . . . ,” “Listen intently and take us seriously . . . ,” and “I cannot understand why it’s so important to stop perfectly innocent citizens. . . .”

From Anthony Morgan, a lawyer with African Canadian Legal Clinic, came perhaps the most stinging words for a departing chief: “We have long memories.”

The hugely controvers­ial issue of carding — when officers stop, question and document citizens, a practice that disproport­ionately affects young brown and black men — is poised to become a black mark on Blair’s legacy, particular­ly after the board’s decision Thursday to pass a policy many see as a watered-down version of the one passed by the board in April 2014.

The carding issue has blown up in the final stretch of the chief’s 10-year tenure, which ends next week. The heated struggle to implement the original carding policy that passed last April has also strained relations within the board.

That much was clear when Blair, moments after Toronto Police Services Board chair Alok Mukherjee praised the outgoing chief for his service, called Mukherjee out for appearing to say in media reports this week that Blair had been insubordin­ate on the issue of carding.

Mukherjee told the Star the board had two options: compromise or charge the chief with insubordin­ation. But Mukherjee denied calling Blair insubordin­ate in that interview.

“It is unfortunat­ely a gross mischaract­erization of our interactio­ns on this issue,” said Blair, staring directly at Mukherjee as he spoke. “I think it’s unfortunat­e the way in which your remarks have perhaps been mischaract­erized but have certainly left the false impression that you believed I was insubordin­ate.”

“I have never said nor will say there was insubordin­ation, and there was none,” Mukherjee responded. The Star is publishing a correction today on A2.

The seven-member civilian board has yet to choose Blair’s successor — final interviews are set for Friday — but an announceme­nt is likely in the coming days.

Some of the citizens speaking at the meeting expressed frustratio­n that whoever comes into the chief’s office next will already have a mess to clean up.

“People are hopeful there will truly be a new direction, but he or she will be encumbered with the fact that already the public trust has been undermined by this policy,” one speaker said.

An April 15 column about Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair’s defence of the force’s carding practices stated that Blair is ending his career with an act of “insubordin­ation” and said that police board chair Alok Mukherjee had characteri­zed Blair’s intransige­nce as actionable insubordin­ation in an interview with another Toronto Star columnist about the carding controvers­y published on April 14. In fact, Mukherjee did not call Blair insubordin­ate but was talking about options available to the board which included charging the chief with insubordin­ation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada