Dr. Oz plans on-air defence against his academic critics
As criticism of his opinions grows in medical community, star MD begins to fight back
Mehmet Oz, the television host known as “Dr. Oz,” plans to set aside a portion of his popular TV show in the coming week to address critics who say he no longer deserves to be associated with a prestigious Ivy League university.
Oz released a statement saying that his TV show simply offers viewers “multiple points of view” about health-related issues and that his own opinions are “offered without conflict of interest.”
He accused his critics of distorting the facts to suit their agendas.
“I bring the public information that will help them on their path to be their best selves,” Oz said.
The detractors sent a letter this past week to Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, where Mehmet Oz is vice-chair of the department of surgery, urging the school to cut ties to the man who promotes green coffee-bean extract, raspberry ketones and other dubious treatments.
“Dr. Oz is guilty of either outrageous conflicts of interest or flawed judgments about what constitutes appropriate medical treatments, or both,” says the letter, signed by 10 physicians.
“Whatever the nature of his pathology, members of the public are being misled and endangered, which makes Dr. Oz’s presence on the faculty of a prestigious medical institution unacceptable.”
The doctors are not the only ones who have taken note of some of Oz’s fantastical claims.
Members of the U.S. Senate took him to task in June for promoting unproven weight-loss products.
“I don’t get why you need to say this stuff, because you know it’s not true,” Sen. Claire McCaskill said in chiding him at a hearing of the House subcommittee on consumer protection, product safety and insurance.
And in December, a study published in the journal BMJ concluded that fewer than one in three claims made on The Dr. Oz Show can find support in the medical literature, while nearly 40 per cent of them can’t be backed up at all.
The doctors who sent the letter to Dr. Lee Goldman, dean of Columbia’s faculties of health sciences and medicine, registered many of the same complaints.
“Dr. Oz has repeatedly shown disdain for science and for evidencebased medicine,” the doctors wrote in their letter.
“Worst of all, he has manifested an egregious lack of integrity by promoting quack treatments and cures in the interest of personal financial gain.”
The letter was signed by two doctors based at Stanford’s Hoover Institution, two retired professors from the University of California, San Diego, a cancer researcher from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine and five others.
Columbia, however, does not seem inclined to reconsider its relationship with Oz or to sanction him for what he says on his show.
Oz is planning to discuss the matter on the air sometime in the coming week, according to a spokesman for his show, though which day has not yet been determined.