Toronto Star

Should cleared captives get compensati­on from the U.S.?

- CAROL ROSENBERG

MIAMI— Retired U.S. Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens shattered the taboo on talking about reparation­s for Guantanamo captives this week in a speech that said some of the nearly 800 men and boys held at the Pentagon’s prison camps in Cuba may be entitled to compensati­on, like Japanese-Americans who were interned during the Second World War.

“I by no means suggest that every Guantanamo detainee, such as those who have been convicted by a military commission, is entitled to compensati­on,” he said in prepared remarks for a meeting of the nonprofit Lawyers for Civil Justice group. “But detainees who have been deemed not to be a security threat to the United States and have thereafter remained in custody for years are differentl­y situated.”

In doing so, the 95-year-old justice who was appointed by Gerald Ford, retired in 2010 and replaced by Elena Kagan, stepped into an ongoing tug-of-war between the White House and Congress about what to do with the last122 captives at Guantanamo — 57 of them approved for release, with host country security assurances.

Many of them are Yemeni, and many of them were provisiona­lly approved for transfer by Bush administra­tion review boards and then again by a 2009 task force set up by U.S. President Barack Obama. Neither administra­tion would repatriate them, citing insecurity in their country.

The Obama administra­tion, however, has been trying to fashion individual resettleme­nt deals for some of them in other countries on a case-bycase basis.

But Congress has made that increasing­ly difficult. Successive legislatio­n has forbidden the transfer of detainees to the United States for any reason, and imposed other restrictio­ns.

At the White House, spokesman Josh Earnest lamented congressio­nal “barriers” to Obama’s goal of closing the detention centre, calling the prison “not consistent with the wise use of our government resources” and “counterpro­ductive.”

He did not, however, offer an opinion on the idea of reparation­s.

Afew former detainees have tried to sue the United States for compensati­on, using different legal theories. But U.S. government lawyers have successful­ly thwarted having the cases heard. In 2010, Britain paid undisclose­d millions in compensati­on to former Guantanamo prisoners who accused the British government of complicity in their U.S. detention.

Stevens, a U.S. navy veteran of the Second World War, called the detention centre a “wasteful extravagan­ce” that should be closed “as promptly as possible.” He adopted a calculus that currently estimates it costs $3 million a year to keep a single detainee at Guantanamo — a formula the commander of the U.S. Southern Command, Marine Gen. John Kelly, disputed a year ago in sworn testimony.

Stevens’ talk, which was posted on the U.S. Supreme Court website, invoked president Franklin Roosevelt’s decision to intern thousands of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War, and noted that the United States twice paid reparation­s — $37 million in1948 and $1.2 billion in 1988.

He also noted that the Bush administra­tion released the overwhelmi­ng majority of detainees released from the prison camps opened in Cuba.

 ?? MARK WILSON/GETTY IMAGES ?? Retired U.S. Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens compared innocent Guantanamo prisoners to interned Japanese-Americans during the Second World War.
MARK WILSON/GETTY IMAGES Retired U.S. Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens compared innocent Guantanamo prisoners to interned Japanese-Americans during the Second World War.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada