Toronto Star

Canada Post wins on community mailboxes

Judge rules Hamilton’s bylaw does not apply to Crown firm

- DIANA MEHTA THE CANADIAN PRESS

Canada Post has emerged victorious from a legal battle that saw it lock horns with the city of Hamilton over the placement of new community mailboxes.

The dispute was closely watched by municipali­ties across the country as the case dealt with just how much of a say local government­s can have over where the controvers­ial mailboxes can be installed.

After hearing both sides make their arguments in court, an Ontario judge found Thursday that a city bylaw, which required Canada Post to obtain a $200 permit per site to install boxes on municipal land, did not apply to the Crown corporatio­n.

“Bylaw No. 15-091 is inapplicab­le and inoperativ­e, in other words, without effect in respect of community mailboxes by or on behalf of Canada Post,” Justice Alan Whitten wrote in his decision.

“This lack of applicabil­ity of the bylaw is understand­able given its conception by those who sought to thwart the policy decision made by Canada Post after considerab­le research and consultati­on, to transition the remaining third of residences from home delivery to community mailboxes.”

The city had brought in the bylaw after resident complaints over safety, privacy, litter and traffic when the mailboxes were installed in what they considered less-than-ideal locations.

With the Hamilton bylaw, city staff would assess each mailbox’s location to ensure it meets city standards before granting a permit to Canada Post.

But Canada Post ignored the bylaw, saying it infringed on federal rules that grant it final say over the location of mail receptacle­s.

When the city issued an order in late April for the mail service to stop installing the community mailboxes until it complied with the bylaw, Canada Post filed a notice in Ontario Superior Court asking for the bylaw to be declared invalid.

In making its arguments in court, Canada Post had said upholding the bylaw would be a breach of federal statute and delay reforms to the national mail service.

It had also said that its move to end home mail delivery is necessary to its financial survival as more Canadians switch to electronic means of communicat­ion.

Whitten found Canada Post is “entitled to make decisions which go to the benefit of its survival.”

Canada Post welcomed the court decision, saying it would continue to “work collaborat­ively” with municipali­ties and homeowners to find suitable locations for its new mailboxes.

A spokesman with the city of Hamilton said the decision was being reviewed carefully in consultati­on with a constituti­onal specialist.

While Thursday’s decision was a win for Canada Post, it still faces legal action on multiple other fronts.

A union representi­ng postal workers wants the Federal Court to declare the cancellati­on of home delivery unconstitu­tional.

And a group of Montreal-area mayors has said it is considerin­g joining the action, accusing Canada Post of ignoring their concerns.

 ?? RYAN REMIORZ/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Hamilton’s community mailbox bylaw would have required Canada Post to obtain a $200 permit per site to install boxes on municipal land.
RYAN REMIORZ/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO Hamilton’s community mailbox bylaw would have required Canada Post to obtain a $200 permit per site to install boxes on municipal land.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada