Toronto Star

THE VILLAGE VOICE

Documentar­y explores gay men’s complex feelings about the way they talk,

- ANA SWANSON THE WASHINGTON POST

Most of us are familiar with the stereotype of a “gay voice.” A man speaks at a higher pitch, and in a more melodious fashion. The man might pronounce his p’s, t’s and k’s very crisply, or have what’s sometimes (incorrectl­y) described as a “lisp.” Think Nathan Lane in The Birdcage, or Buddy Cole of The Kids in the Hall.

But is there any reality in this stereotype? Do gay men actually sound different than straight men? And if so, why?

These are the questions in a new documentar­y, Do I Sound Gay? It’s a fascinatin­g and nuanced film, in which the director, David Thorpe, uses his feelings about his voice to look at attitudes toward homosexual­ity. It raises a complicate­d discussion about gay pride, lingering homophobia, disguised misogyny and the extent to which we all alter the image that we present to the world.

As the film begins, Thorpe is disturbed because he realizes he doesn’t like his voice anymore. He’s just gone through a breakup and is feeling unconfiden­t and low. “Who could respect, much less fall in love with, an old braying ninny like me?” he asks.

With these feelings of self-loathing, Thorpe sets on a journey to see if he can become more comfortabl­e with his voice again (and, presumably, with himself ). He enrols in voice coaching that promises to give him a “powerful and authentic” voice.

Thorpe explores in other ways the meaning behind his voice and his discomfort with it. He carries out thoughtful conversati­ons with his friends and prominent gay and lesbian figures — including George Takei, David Sedaris, Dan Savage, Margaret Cho and Don Lemon — about what it means to “sound gay.” And though these people are all proud of their sexuality, he finds many of them have surprising­ly complex feelings about their voices.

The film asks more questions than it answers. But in so doing, it invites everyone to think about what their own voice says about who they are, where they came from and where they want to go. The science of ‘the gay voice’ To start with, the stereotypi­cal “gay voice” isn’t necessaril­y gay.

In a study published in 2003, Ron Smyth, a linguist at the University of Toronto, found that participan­ts readily separated recordings of 25 diverse voices into those who “sounded gay” and those who “sounded straight.” People picked up on features of the gay stereotype — voices that were higher and more melodious were more often labelled “gay.”

The trouble was that these labels had little relationsh­ip with sexuality. In Smyth’s study, people correctly guessed a man’s sexuality about 60 per cent of the time, only a little better than random.

In another small study at the University of Hawaii, both gay and straight listeners were equally likely to misclassif­y people as gay or straight. In fact, the straight men with so-called gay voices weren’t aware that people thought they sounded gay at all.

It turns out that what most people perceive as a stereotypi­cal “gay voice” is just a male voice that sounds more stereotypi­cally feminine — mainly higher pitched and more melodious. And that often has more to do with the voices that a person identified with as they grew up, rather than their sexuality.

Smyth and other researcher­s say some men, gay and straight, develop more feminine voices because they are influenced by women when young. They might be raised by women, or gravitate toward female role models or friends, Smyth says.

“Some men with ‘gay voices’ are straight, and some men with ‘straight voices’ are gay,” says Smyth. “There are butch and femme gay men; there are butch and femme straight men; there are butch and femme straight women.” And so on.

Beyond the environmen­t that a person is raised in, one’s peers and self-identity can also influence one’s voice. Linguists have long observed that people code-switch — slip into a different accent or way of speaking when they’re talking to different groups of people, sometimes without even realizing it.

For gay men, adopting what’s called “camp” — a theatrical gay accent, like an old-school starlet — can be a way of embracing their identity. “As a freshly minted gay man, I learned how camping it up could be liberating,” Thorpe says in the film.

And there may be more subtle ways that sexuality and our sense of self influence our voices.

Benjamin Munson, who studies language and speech at the University of Minnesota, found in one study that gay men did use a slightly different pronunciat­ion than straight men. However, the difference wasn’t the stereotypi­cal “gay voice,” but a tendency to use a more contempora­ry, pan-American accent, rather than the old-fashioned Minnesota accent (as in the movie Fargo). A stubborn stigma Do I Sound Gay? shows that men who are out and proud may still carry with them some shame about having a stereotypi­cal “gay voice,” even if those feelings are subconscio­us.

Dan Savage, a gay activist and author, argues in the film that this is a natural consequenc­e of boys being bullied for walking and talking a certain way when they are young. They grow up “policing” themselves for evidence that might betray them, like their voice, he says.

Running beneath these negative feelings is also a strong current of misogyny, an ingrained prejudice against women, say Thorpe, Savage and others. Misogyny and homophobia are “evil twins,” which both have a root in sexism and devaluing things that are female, says Thorpe.

“Because we do still live in a misogynist and sexist culture, people criticize men who are effeminate, whether or not they are gay.”

Like most kids, Thorpe was painfully sensitive to what made him different. He grew up in the U.S. Bible Belt in the 1980s, when homosexual­ity was often considered evil and the cause of a new plague called AIDS, he says. He didn’t know anyone who was openly gay.

At the time, there were also almost no positive gay characters in the media. As Thorpe points out in the film, there have long been public entertaine­rs or artists with stereotypi­cally “gay voices” — Liberace or Truman Capote, for example — but few peo- ple openly talked about their homosexual­ity.

And when characters with “gay” mannerisms or voices appeared in popular culture, they were sometimes coded with negative or insidious meanings.

From the 1940s on, American film saw the rise of a snide, supercilio­us and vaguely gay villain, starting with the manipulati­ve Clifton Webb in the detective noir film Laura. That tradition of the effete, aristocrat­ic villain has lived on.

Film historian Richard Barrios argues in the documentar­y that many Disney villains have simpering voices or mannerisms that are subtly — or not so subtly — stereotypi­cally gay, including Prince John in Robin Hood and Scar in The Lion King.

In an interview, Thorpe points out what he viewed as one particular­ly egregious example: the bad guy in the 2012 Disney animated film Wreck-It Ralph.

“The villain in that film is called King Candy, and he is very conspicuou­sly effeminate,” says Thorpe. “And at one point in the film the hero even refers to him as ‘nelly wafer.’ (This is a play on a ‘Nilla wafer’ — a kind of cookie — and the word ‘nelly,’ a derogatory term for gay men, says Thorpe.)

“It seems innocent and fun, but when you understand the tradition from which that stereotype and those villains come from, it’s not innocent, and it’s not harmless . . . This stereotype is still hanging out,” Thorpe says.

Things are getting better, though, he adds. Thorpe points to Hollywood’s prominent “gaylebriti­es,” such as Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Neil Patrick Harris, and young gay YouTube stars such as Tyler Oakley, Kingsley and Lohanthony.

“We are pioneers in our time in changing societal perception of what it means to be gay,” George Takei, who played Sulu in Star Trek, says in the film.

But homophobia still affects Hollywood. Many actors work to make their voices sound masculine: Bob Corff, a Hollywood speech therapist visited by Thorpe, says 20 to 50 people a year come to him to sound “less gay.” The tyranny of a voice The voice coaching in the film follows the self-help narrative of actualizat­ion and improvemen­t, but it has an unsettling undercurre­nt. How much effort should we really expend trying to change something like our voice? At what point does this stop being improvemen­t and start being prejudice?

Of course, many speech therapists help people who are struggling with issues that prevent them from communicat­ing effectivel­y. But others help people alter their voices to erase markers of race, class, gender and birthplace.

“For most of American history, certainly, that straight, white, standard way of speaking has exemplifie­d who is in charge,” Thorpe says.

Thorpe’s film focuses on his own experience, but a few interviewe­es hint at how this issue affects racial minorities. Don Lemon, the gay African-American news anchor, talks about how he intentiona­lly lost his black, southern accent. Margaret Cho, the bisexual Asian-American comedian, discusses the great lengths her father took to lose his Asian accent.

These stories hint at a deep contradict­ion. No one would allow a major TV network to bar an anchor for being black, yet “sounding black” as an anchor may not be acceptable.

These are difficult things to talk about, but they are conversati­ons worth having.

As Thorpe says in the film, people often say you shouldn’t ask a question if you can’t handle the answer. But Thorpe maintains that if you can’t handle the answer, that’s a question you’ve got to ask.

“Some men with ‘gay voices’ are straight, and some men with ‘straight voices’ are gay.” RON SMYTH UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LINGUIST

 ?? RICHARD LAUTENS/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? Childhood bullying is why many gay men feel ashamed of their voices, says columnist Dan Savage, left, with Do I Sound Gay? filmmaker David Thorpe.
RICHARD LAUTENS/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO Childhood bullying is why many gay men feel ashamed of their voices, says columnist Dan Savage, left, with Do I Sound Gay? filmmaker David Thorpe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada