EXPLAINER: MAMMALS THRIVE DESPITE RADIATION
A new study of wildlife in the radiationcontaminated Chernobyl exclusion zone has found that many large mammal populations — elk, roe deer, red deer, wild boar and wolves — seem to be thriving.
The findings, published in the journal Current Biology, hint that when it comes to threats to wildlife, a nuclear disaster may actually be less harmful than human encroachment.
“These results demonstrate for the first time that, regardless of potential radiation effects on individual animals, the Chernobyl exclusion zone supports an abundant mammal community after nearly three decades of chronic radiation,” the study authors wrote.
The 1986 accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine — then part of the Soviet Union — was among the world’s most catastrophic nuclear disasters. An explosion and a fire at the plant released a plume of radioactive material into the atmosphere, spreading over several countries and triggering the permanent evacuation of an estimated 116,000 people from the 4,200 square-kilometre Chernobyl exclusion zone.
But wild animals can’t be told to evacuate, and so researchers long thought that the radiation would result in deleterious consequences for the wildlife in the area.
“Several previous studies of the Chernobyl exclusion zone indicated major radiation effects and pronounced reductions in wildlife populations at dose rates well below those thought to cause significant impacts,” the study’s authors noted.
The new findings show otherwise. For this paper, an international team of researchers tracked animal activity in the Polessye State Radioecological Reserve, the portion of the Chernobyl exclusion zone that lies in Belarus, and represents about half of the zone’s total area. They analyzed population density estimates that were based on winter track survey routes, and compared them with the numbers from other uncontaminated reserves in the area.
“Relative abundances of elk, roe deer, red deer and wild boar within the Chernobyl exclusion zone are similar to those in four (uncontaminated) nature reserves in the region and wolf abundance is more than seventimes higher,” the study authors wrote.
“Additionally, our earlier helicopter survey data show rising trends in elk, roe deer and wild boar abundances from one to ten years post-accident.”
They also found that the elk and wild boar populations in the exclusion zone were rising during a period in the early 1990s when those species’ populations were dropping in other former Soviet Union countries — a decline probably brought on by socioeconomic changes leading to rural poverty and poorer wildlife management.
How is this possible? It seems that any harm from the radioactive fallout is far outweighed by the benefit of not having humans around.
Before the accident, the study’s authors said, mammal population densities were probably reduced because of hunting, forestry and agriculture — human encroachment on their habitats, in other words.
“Our data on time trends cannot separate likely positive effects of human abandonment of the Chernobyl exclusion zone from a potential negative effect of radiation . . . Nevertheless, they represent unique evidence of wildlife’s resilience in the face of chronic radiation stress,” the authors wrote.