Toronto Star

Globe endorses Tories, minus Stephen Harper

Time for leader to ‘take his leave,’ but party deserves another chance to govern

- BEN SPURR STAFF REPORTER

The Globe and Mail stirred controvers­y on Friday by publishing an editorial endorsemen­t that backed the Conservati­ve party in Monday’s federal election, as long as Stephen Harper steps down after the vote.

The editorial described the culture of the federal government under Harper as “rotten,” but said his party deserves another shot at power.

It was unsparing in its criticism of the Conservati­ve leader, however, condemning his “narrowness of vision” and “meanness of spirit” on issues ranging from voting rights and his law-and-order agenda, to his treatment of the nation’s scientific community and judiciary.

“The topper,” according to the editorial, has been the Harper campaign’s descent into an “Americanst­yle, culture war over niqabs and ‘barbaric cultural practices.’ ”

“The spectacle of a prime minister seemingly willing to say anything, or demonize anyone, in an attempt to get re-elected has demeaned our politics,” the editorial declared.

But while asserting that after nine years of Harper’s government, Canadians have a “well-founded desire for change,” the editorial argued that the Conservati­ves’ economic record was “solid,” and the need for financial stability trumped the benefits that would come with throwing out the Tory government.

“It is not time for the Conservati­ves to go. But it is time for Mr. Harper to take his leave,” the editorial stated, and called on Harper to “quickly resign” after the Oct. 19 vote so that Tories could build a more inclusive party. It did not say which Conservati­ve MP should replace him as prime minister.

The editorial was mocked by Twitter users, who accused the Globe of taking a contradict­ory position and cracked jokes under the hashtag #OtherGlobe­Endorsemen­ts.

“We endorse the rock, not roll,” wrote Chris Turner. “I endorse Tom Petty, but not the Heartbreak­ers,” quipped @knightgroo­ve.

Globe editor-in-chief David Walmsley did not immediatel­y return the Star’s request for comment on Friday evening. But in a Facebook question-and-answer session earlier in the day, he explained the thinking behind the endorsemen­t, which he said had been his decision.

“The half-heartednes­s (of the editorial) is a sign of the weakness of the political candidates. It would be great to find a clear obvious winner the country could unite behind, but we don’t have that at the moment,” he wrote in response to one Facebook user.

“We endorse the economic stewardshi­p of the Conservati­ves not the divisivene­ss,” he told another.

The Globe was hardly the only Canadian newspaper that saw fit to back Harper’s Conservati­ves. This week, publicatio­ns run by Postmedia, which owns more than 40 daily newspapers across the country, began publishing editorials supportive of the Tories that also cited the party’s economic credential­s as its main strength.

As of Friday night, Postmedia’s flagship publicatio­n, the National Post, had yet to run an endorsemen­t.

In the run-up to an election, newspaper editorial pages traditiona­lly carry endorsemen­ts that outline which candidate the papers’ editors or publishers believe is the best to hold power.

On Oct. 9, the Star endorsed Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau.

 ??  ?? Editor-in-chief David Walmsley said the Globe and Mail backs the stewardshi­p of the Tories.
Editor-in-chief David Walmsley said the Globe and Mail backs the stewardshi­p of the Tories.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada