Toronto Star

Flamboyant tax lawyer guilty of misconduct

DioGuardi suspended six weeks, fined $5,000 after agreeing he ‘failed to act with integrity’

- KENYON WALLACE AND DALE BRAZAO STAFF REPORTERS

Self-styled tax fighter Philippe DioGuardi has been given a six-week suspension, a $5,000 fine and an order to pay $75,000 in legal costs after being found guilty of profession­al misconduct by the Law Society of Upper Canada.

The flamboyant DioGuardi, 54, who has spent more than a decade developing a reputation as the bulldog lawyer who takes on the Canada Revenue Agency, was put on a short leash Friday after the law society tribunal agreed to a joint submission by lawyers for DioGuardi and the law society.

DioGuardi has become well-known for a series of slick advertisin­g campaigns featuring tax agents in dark suits and sunglasses and inviting tax debtors to call him at “the first sign of tax trouble.”

DioGuardi was present at the hearing but did not speak to the tribunal.

“The lawyer admits that he committed profession­al misconduct,” said Louise Hurteau, the law society’s discipline counsel.

The law society’s applicatio­n to the tribunal included allegation­s that DioGuardi took money from six clients before performing “any or very little legal service,” and in some cases “failed to perform legal services to the standard of a competent lawyer.”

DioGuardi also failed to file income tax returns for a client in a timely manner, the law society alleged in its applicatio­n.

In an email to the Star later Friday, DioGuardi said the suspension was “fair and appropriat­e.”

“I chose to bring this disciplina­ry matter to an end when it became apparent to me that perfect adherence to the bylaw took precedence over protection of client property,” DioGuardi wrote.

“For this reason, and to protect my family and my family name from media attention that expanded beyond the disciplina­ry matter to include private personal details, I entered into an agreement with the law society, and I will comply fully with the law society bylaws.”

As part of the agreed-upon penalty, DioGuardi must submit to a review of his practice by the law society.

In its submission­s, the law society charged that DioGuardi “failed to act with integrity” by having eight clients sign retainer agreements that benefited his law firm, DioGuardi Tax Law, to the “potential detriment” of those clients.

Law society lawyer Hurteau described a pattern in which DioGuardi would deposit client retainer money into the firm’s general account, as opposed to a trust account. This move gave DioGuardi ownership over client money prior to any work being done.

A law society bylaw states that client funds must be deposited in a trust account and can only be drawn once work is completed.

“The lawyer admits . . . that he was asking his clients to effectivel­y relieve him of his regulatory requiremen­ts, which is not permitted,” Hurteau told the tribunal.

“I think what has to be brought home to lawyers is that you can’t contract out your profession­al responsibi­lities.”

DioGuardi’s lawyer, Melvyn Solmon, told the tribunal the reason DioGuardi did not leave his clients’ money in a trust account was to keep it out of the hands of the CRA if they came looking for it. He said his client had no intention of breaching the law society bylaw.

“His intention was to protect the clients’ retainer funds,” said Solmon, who told the tribunal that “no client was hurt.”

Hurteau also said DioGuardi would meet with clients, take a retainer, then delegate work to other staff in his office, “but (with) Mr. DioGuardi always having responsibi­lity and oversight.” She said there were patterns in which DioGuardi failed to keep clients up to date with the status of their files, failed to obtain informatio­n from the CRA and failed to give advice “which ought to have been given.”

Solmon said DioGuardi acknowledg­ed that some clients were not served.

“It doesn’t matter the reason why, whether it’s failure to monitor, failure to delegate properly or even missing deadlines, the objective is to make sure the client is served. If the client is not served, then that is profession­al misconduct,” Solmon told the tribunal.

AStar investigat­ion earlier this year of DioGuardi’s practice and lifestyle revealed an embattled lawyer fight- ing on several fronts: defending himself against the law society misconduct charges; fending off lawsuits from angry clients; trying to keep the CRA at bay; and dealing with a nasty divorce.

The Star story also revealed that he overdrew his firm’s account by $2 million, and at one point owed the CRA more than $140,000 in back taxes. DioGuardi told the Star earlier this year that “the arrears were paid off in full over time.”

Known for his penchant for beaver and wolf fur coats and luxury cars, DioGuardi blamed his financial woes partly on a nasty divorce from his wife, Elena DioGuardi, who was at one time demanding $25,000 a month in spousal support, the Star investigat­ion showed.

DioGuardi explained in his affidavit for his divorce proceeding­s that, in an attempt to appease Elena, he purchased a condo and Mercedes for her in Russia, spent more than $200,000 on furs, $200,000 on jewelry and $20,000 on designer handbags.

In a letter to the Star earlier this year, DioGuardi said he is responsibl­e for putting two of his children through university and caring for his youngest child, who is autistic and requires “extraordin­ary financial support.”

DioGuardi, who has offices in Toronto, Mississaug­a and Ottawa, has built a career as an “adversaria­l” tax lawyer through a slick multimilli­ondollar infomercia­l and ad campaign.

In one radio ad, DioGuardi depicts a CRA agent as playing “Mr. Nice Guy to get details about your bank accounts and your house, and then sends in the wolves to seize your money and your assets.”

Kenyon Wallace can be reached at 416-869-4734 or kwallace@thestar.ca.

 ??  ?? A Star investigat­ion revealed that Philippe DioGuardi, familiar for his TV ads, faced a litany of financial woes.
A Star investigat­ion revealed that Philippe DioGuardi, familiar for his TV ads, faced a litany of financial woes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada