Toronto Star

Porter push for jets hits dead-end

Port authority won’t complete studies requested by city council

- DAVID RIDER CITY HALL BUREAU CHIEF

Porter Airlines’ push to bring jet service to an expanded Toronto island airport is officially dead.

PortsToron­to, the federal port authority, said in a statement it has halted work on an environmen­tal assessment and two studies city council requested in 2014.

“PortsToron­to will complete the technical work currently underway, but will not proceed with further public engagement-related activities pertaining to the Porter Proposal to introduce jets,” chief executive Geoffrey Wilson said in a statement.

“As such, the studies will not be finished. PortsToron­to will make data and informatio­n gathered to date available to the city of Toronto and stakeholde­rs that may be helpful to the Bathurst Quay Neighbourh­ood Plan currently being led by the city of Toronto.”

Porter launched its controvers­ial expansion proposal in April 2013.

The runway would have been expanded a half-kilometre into the harbour as part of a bigger Billy Bishop airport, which was expected to result in more than doubling its use, to 5.5 million passengers a year.

Last month, Transport Minister Marc Garneau said his government would not renegotiat­e an airport agreement among the city of Toronto, PortsToron­to and the federal government.

The port authority said at the time that, absent any specific direction from the federal government, it was putting finishing touches on the studies for delivery to city council in early 2016.

The ongoing studies were seized on as a source of hope by those fighting to keep alive Porter’s dream of offering Bombardier CSeries jet service to destinatio­ns, including Miami and Los Angeles, not reachable by Porter’s Bombardier Q400 turboprops.

Porter said Tuesday it is glad some technical work on the studies continues but has no other comment while the company assesses the situation.

Councillor Joe Cressy, representi­ng the downtown ward that includes the airport, welcomed news that the studies won’t be completed.

“We know jets will not fly out of an expanded island airport . . . Our city can finally return to the work of ensuring existing airport operations best fit in with the local neighbourh­ood, the city and local waterfront revitaliza­tion,” Cressy said.

Traffic chaos, particular­ly around the airport at the foot of Bathurst St., saw Cressy’s predecesso­r, Adam Vaughan, now the area’s Liberal MP, spar for years with the port authority, which is still primarily governed by Conservati­ve appointees.

Cressy said there have been more than 50 meetings in the past year about the Bathurst Quay plan to improve “public realm” and park space and enhance community services.

PortsToron­to is vowing “to work collaborat­ively with the city of Toronto and waterfront stakeholde­rs to ensure that the airport strikes an appropriat­e balance along the waterfront while continuing to offer a vital gateway for travellers.”

Vaughan said he’s pleased with the decision. Future PortsToron­to appointmen­ts will be “transparen­t and based on merit, not political” and Waterfront Toronto will now be the lead on waterfront issues.

 ?? LUCAS OLENIUK/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? Porter Airlines launched its now-defunct expansion proposal in April 2013.
LUCAS OLENIUK/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO Porter Airlines launched its now-defunct expansion proposal in April 2013.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada