Toronto Star

Liberals aim to balance security with rights

Canadians will be consulted on changes to controvers­ial Bill C-51 drafted in 2014

- JIM BRONSKILL THE CANADIAN PRESS

“If the messages indicate that something more needs to be done, obviously we would try to pursue that.” RALPH GOODALE PUBLIC SAFETY MINISTER

OTTAWA— The Liberal government is open to an expansive revamp of national security legislatio­n, not just a handful of promised changes to the controvers­ial anti-terrorism bill known as C-51, says Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale.

The government will allow Canadians to have their say before deciding what changes to make, Goodale told The Canadian Press on Saturday.

“If the consultati­on leads to a broader set of action items, obviously we would be guided by what that consultati­on tells us,” he said. “The subject matter is large, it’s complex, the solutions aren’t particular­ly easy to achieve. But our whole point in having consultati­ons is to listen to what we hear. And if the messages indicate that something more needs to be done, obviously we would try to pursue that.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has asked Goodale to work with Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to repeal the “problemati­c elements” of Bill C-51 and introduce new legislatio­n that strengthen­s accountabi­lity with respect to national security while better balancing collective security with rights and freedoms.

The government has pledged to ensure all Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service warrants respect the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That would roll back new provisions allowing CSIS to disrupt terrorist plots through tactics that breach the charter as long as a judge approves.

It has also committed to creating a special parliament­ary committee to keep an eye on security operations.

Organizati­ons including Amnesty Internatio­nal Canada and the Ottawa-based Internatio­nal Civil Liberties Monitoring Group have urged the Liberals to go further, by implementi­ng neglected 2006 recommenda­tions on a comprehens­ive security review from the inquiry into the overseas torture of Maher Arar.

Others have called for a rethinking of tools needed to counter jihadistin­spired extremism, as well as stronger measures to protect privacy.

Goodale said the previous government failed to consult the public properly when it ushered in C-51 after attacks that killed soldiers in StJean-sur-Richelieu, Que., and Ottawa just days apart in October 2014. “There was a moment there when collaborat­ion of a rare and extraordin­ary kind was possible. The government chose to go a different way. They chose to proceed unilateral­ly without that kind of consultati­on or engagement. And the end result produced a flawed piece of legislatio­n.”

Ottawa hasn’t decided whether to have a standing committee carry out the review or to create a special committee to do the job, he said.

The Liberals may also engage in public consultati­ons through “tools and techniques that take us beyond the parliament­ary precinct.”

“The point here is that we genuinely want to hear from Canadians,” Goodale said. “They didn’t have the opportunit­y before, we want to give them the opportunit­y now, to make sure that, in the resetting of the national security framework, we get it right.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada