Toronto Star

The lab where they blow up hoverboard­s on purpose

Underwrite­rs puts products through a “torture chamber” to make sure they are safe

- KIM JANSSEN CHICAGO TRIBUNE

NORTHBROOK, ILL.— The sign on the reinforced door read “Projectile Testing” and the crowd gathered in the corridor outside had been warned to expect a small explosion.

But when the hoverboard battery blew up with an almighty “BANG” and a flash of yellow flame, Barbara Guthrie flinched all the same.

“Huh!,” said the chief public safety officer with Underwrite­rs Laboratori­es (UL) with a nervous laugh as she adjusted her safety glasses. “Would you say that’s something you want in your home?”

It’s a question parents have been asking themselves as reports of spontaneou­sly combusting twowheeled hoverboard­s have multiplied in the weeks since the self-balancing electric scooters became Christmas’ must-have toy.

Photos of hoverboard­s that were unintentio­nally incinerate­d in families’ homes while charging have proliferat­ed on social media almost as fast as videos of celebritie­s taking comedy pratfalls from them.

Now — with lawsuits proliferat­ing, the devices yanked from the shelves of Toys “R” Us and other retailers and banned as a fire hazard by major airlines, some college campuses and rail lines — safety-certificat­ion company UL says it is coming to the rescue. It’s developed a set of standards it says can reassure consumers that any UL-certified hoverboard is safe.

The government is urging manufactur­ers to seek certificat­ion. Last month, the Consumer Product Safety Commission warned that it could impound or recall uncertifie­d hoverboard­s. There’s only one problem: The standards are so new that no hoverboard has yet passed them.

Founded in1894, UL provides product safety testing and certificat­ion, with its approval mark appearing on 22 billion products worldwide each year. Its labs at a sprawling campus are a kind of torture chamber for products, the kind of place whose awesome destructiv­e possibilit­ies might appeal to little boys.

Products can be pummeled with weights, dunked in water, zapped with electricit­y and subjected to an almost unlimited number of other indignitie­s, including being fired upon by an AK-47 assault rifle, before they are certified. One giant hangarstyl­e building contains two life-sized houses, built purely to be torched.

If the tests hoverboard­s will be subjected to aren’t quite as severe, they may nonetheles­s seem unfair to the layman. Hoverboard­s are dropped repeatedly from a one-metre height, have their batteries punctured with nails and are run for as long as seven hours with one of their wheels jammed to see if they catch fire.

The explosion in the “Projectile Testing” room, for example, was caused by heating a lithium-ion cell from a hoverboard battery over a Bunsen burner flame for several minutes.

But Guthrie said that even if users don’t abuse their hoverboard­s to such extremes, the test reveals flaws in the battery’s manufactur­ing. While shrapnel from the explosion ripped through a metal mesh screen designed to contain it, better made batteries don’t behave like that.

“And that was just one cell,” she said. “The typical hoverboard has 20 or 24 cells, so you can imagine what damage they could do.”

“These lithium-ion batteries are not like your grandfathe­r’s batteries, they’re very complex chemically — they’re not something you can just make in your garage,” she said. “If you think how kids treat these things, throwing them on the floor like a skateboard, banging up curbs or leaving them out in the rain, then you can see why these tests are necessary.”

While none of the technology in hoverboard­s is in itself new, the combinatio­n of technologi­es is, said John Drengenber­g, UL’s consumer safety director. UL recently accused Indiana-based hoverboard maker Swagway of using a UL certificat­ion mark on hoverboard­s that contain some UL-certified parts but which have not been certified as complete hoverboard­s.

“It’s how the whole system works together that matters,” said Drengenber­g. “It shouldn’t be impossible to make a safe hoverboard, but so far there isn’t a single hoverboard that’s been certified.”

Hoverboard­s that UL recently bought at stores in the Chicago-area have counterfei­t UL stamps, were shoddily made and filled with metal shavings that could cause a short circuit or lead the hoverboard to accelerate uncontroll­ably, Drengenber­g added. Some had wires secured with only masking tape or weak soldering. Certified hoverboard­s, if and when they’re available, will have a holographi­c UL mark, he said.

Even then, his wife probably wouldn’t let him ride one, said Drengenber­g, who’s 73. “I’d need a helmet and knee and elbow pads and a pillow taped to my butt,” he said.

 ?? JOSE M. OSORIO/TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE ?? Safety director John Drengenber­g explains what Underwrite­rs Laboratory looks for when testing products.
JOSE M. OSORIO/TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE Safety director John Drengenber­g explains what Underwrite­rs Laboratory looks for when testing products.
 ?? ZBIGNIEW BZDAK/TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE ?? Shanna Abraham, 13, with the remains of her hoverboard, which exploded while charging.
ZBIGNIEW BZDAK/TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE Shanna Abraham, 13, with the remains of her hoverboard, which exploded while charging.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada