Toronto Star

Too little, and too slow

-

Stung by disclosure of secret fundraisin­g targets assigned to Liberal cabinet ministers, Premier Kathleen Wynne is promising “significan­t reforms” in a plan to be released this fall.

But what she proposes looks more like a rearguard effort to maintain an unconscion­able practice than a bold initiative to end it. According to Wynne, full reform of political fundraisin­g will “probably not” be in place even before the next election, more than two and a half years away.

Preserving an opportunit­y to cash in, quite literally, for years to come appears to be her priority, rather than protecting the public interest. That’s both ethically wrong and politicall­y short-sighted.

At the very least, Wynne could announce — without further discussion, consultati­on or “transition” — an immediate end to the repugnant practice of assigning cabinet ministers secret fundraisin­g targets. Such goals are typically met by attracting donations from the very sectors they are supposed to be overseeing.

There’s an inescapabl­e perception here that ministers are being instructed to cash in on their public office in order to fund the Liberal party. It’s an obvious conflict of interest. But that hasn’t prompted Wynne to take decisive action. There’s just too much money at stake to stop it right away.

Precisely how much became clear only on Tuesday, when the Star’s Martin Regg Cohn revealed that some ministers in major portfolios are assigned yearly targets of as much as $500,000. That’s the goal set for Finance Minster Charles Sousa and Health Minister Eric Hoskins, who is in charge of Ontario’s $52-billion health budget.

If just those two met their target, it would mean up to $4 million landing in Liberal coffers over a typical government term. But the windfall doesn’t end there. Other ministers are assigned by the Ontario Liberal Fund to collect $300,000, or $250,000 or $150,000 yearly, depending on the sector they oversee.

It’s telling that these targets are held in close secrecy, with even colleagues around the cabinet table unaware of what each has been told to raise. Former Liberal attorney general John Gerretsen told the Star he “hated” this system. Former finance minister Dwight Duncan said he was “sick of it” and described the unsavory practice as one of the reasons he quit Queen’s Park.

Wynne admitted that Gerretsen had expressed his displeasur­e directly to her. Yet even now, amid a storm of well-deserved outrage over party fundraisin­g, Wynne is opting for slow change and half-measures.

Just hours after the Star revealed her ministers’ fundraisin­g targets, Wynne told reporters new restrictio­ns were on the way. “We’re working on significan­t reforms right now,” she said.

A plan is to be released this fall that will include new rules on political advertisin­g by outside groups and a “transition­ing away” from corporate and union donations.

Wynne has repeatedly been urged to clean up election financing, especially by banning contributi­ons from corporatio­ns and unions. The federal government has already done so, along with the City of Toronto and provinces including Quebec, Manitoba and Alberta. Wynne finally appears willing to move in this direction but insists on allowing years of transition.

To be fair, there was a transition period when the federal government banned corporate and union donations. But it’s not clear why Ontario’s should last as far as the next election.

Furthermor­e, there’s no excuse to continue the secret fundraisin­g targets imposed on cabinet ministers. The premier could immediatel­y end this reprehensi­ble practice. The fact that Wynne refuses to do so does her no credit and risks further damaging her party’s reputation with voters.

Premier Kathleen Wynne should move quickly to fix the province’s fundraisin­g rules

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada