Toronto Star

Spy agencies eye more wide-ranging partnershi­p

Plan by CSE, CSIS could pose problem for watchdogs reviewing their activities

- ALEX BOUTILIER OTTAWA BUREAU

OTTAWA— Canada’s two main spy agencies are looking to “maximize” opportunit­ies to work together despite continued concerns about watchdogs’ ability to keep tabs on joint operations.

Documents obtained by the Star show the Communicat­ions Security Establishm­ent (CSE) and the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service (CSIS) are looking for new and expanded ways to align their operations.

But as Canada’s intelligen­ce agencies co-operate more and more, those charged with reviewing the spies’ actions may have a harder time seeing the big picture.

“The intelligen­ce community has become increasing­ly integrated over the years,” said Lindsay Jackson, a spokeswoma­n for the Security Intelligen­ce Review Committee (SIRC), which reviews CSIS operations. “But there hasn’t been any integratio­n on the review side . . . (that) would allow us to make sure that everything that is being done by the intelligen­ce agencies is lawful, and is necessary, and within the mandates of those organizati­ons.”

The two intelligen­ce agencies have different mandates. CSE is forbidden from spying on Canadians, instead focusing on foreign electronic espionage. CSIS can and does investigat­e Canadians in efforts to sniff out threats to national security.

CSE is permitted to assist CSIS, however, so long as the service has legal authority to request that assistance. This is known as CSE’s “Mandate C,” alongside the agency’s responsibi­lities to collect foreign intelligen­ce and defend government networks. “CSE and CSIS have unique mandates but are bound together by similar national security goals,” state the documents, labelled top secret and obtained under access to informatio­n legislatio­n.

“While CSIS and CSE work together on specific operationa­l initiative­s, engagement through (a working group) thus far has identified a range of opportunit­ies for greater organizati­onal cohesion.”

The heavily censored documents were sent by CSE chief Greta Bossenmaie­r and CSIS director Michel Coulombe to Richard Fadden, the national security adviser to the prime minister, in August 2015. Fadden was both a former director of CSIS and the former top bureaucrat at National Defence, which is responsibl­e for CSE. Fadden announced his retirement on Thursday.

Bossenmaie­r and Coulombe suggest the two agencies are trying to “leverage (CSE’s) Mandate C authoritie­s,” and set up a working group to “maximize opportunit­ies for operationa­l collaborat­ion.”

That could spell trouble for the small group of independen­t watchdogs reviewing the spy agencies’ activities. Both Security Intelligen­ce Review Committee and the CSE Commission­er’s office can review their respective agencies but can’t conduct joint investigat­ions.

That prevents the watchdogs from “following the thread” when opera- tions cross from one agency to another, obscuring the full picture of what the spies are actually doing.

William Galbraith, a spokesman for CSE commission­er Jean-Pierre Plouffe, noted the commission­er told a Senate committee last year that Canadian law should be changed to explicitly allow co-operation between his office, the SIRC, and the RCMP’s civilian complaints commission.

Craig Forcese, a University of Ottawa professor who has been closely studying recent changes to Canada’s terrorism laws, said collaborat­ion between the two spy agencies has been modest in the past.

“But the future is an unknown country in that respect,” Forcese said in an interview Tuesday.

“If you look at the list that CSIS says that it wants to do with their new threat reduction powers (granted under Bill C-51), it includes interferin­g with financial transactio­ns, interferin­g with communicat­ions, interferin­g with a Twitter account, those are all technical interventi­ons that one would assume CSE is often better equipped than before.”

The August 2015 memo is the latest step in a long march toward greater integratio­n of CSE’s foreign intelligen­ce gathering and CSIS’s national security investigat­ions.

CSE recently moved into a new, $4.1-billion headquarte­rs nicknamed the “Spy Palace,” located directly across from CSIS’s Ottawa HQ.

The agencies signed two landmark co-operation agreements in 1990, and began to work more closely after the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

Separate documents obtained by the Star show a senior CSIS official has been “integrated into CSE as the director of the CSE-CSIS Collaborat­ion Office” during the 2014-15 fiscal year.

The documents, prepared for Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan, add the October 2014 attack on Parliament Hill led to greater informatio­n sharing between the two agencies. The specifics of that initiative were censored from the documents.

 ??  ?? Former CSIS head Richard Fadden, left, CSE commission­er Jean-Pierre Plouffe and CSIS director Michel Coulombe seek a stronger co-operation.
Former CSIS head Richard Fadden, left, CSE commission­er Jean-Pierre Plouffe and CSIS director Michel Coulombe seek a stronger co-operation.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada