Toronto Star

Ukraine’s kids eating food tainted by radiation

Axed programs force families to turn to food from land contaminat­ed by Chernobyl

- YURAS KARMANAU

ZALYSHANY, UKRAINE— Viktoria Vetrova knows the risk her four children take in drinking milk from the family’s two cows and eating dried mushrooms and berries from the forest.

But the cash-strapped Ukrainian government cancelled the local school lunch program for 350,000 children last year — the only source of clean food in this village near Chernobyl.

So rural families are resorting to milk and produce from land still contaminat­ed by fallout from the world’s worst nuclear accident three decades ago. Vetrova’s 8-year-old son Bogdan suffers from an enlarged thyroid, a condition which studies have linked to radioactiv­ity.

“We are aware of the dangers, but what can we do?” Vetrova asked, standing in her kitchen after pouring aglass of milk. “There is no other way to survive.”

Vetrova’s family and thousands of others are caught between the consequenc­es of two disasters: the residue from Chernobyl and the recent plunge of Ukraine’s economy.

After the April 26, 1986, explosion and fire, the most heavily affected areas in Ukraine were classified into four zones. Residents from three of them were evacuated or allowed to volunteer for resettleme­nt. But the village of Zalyshany, 53 kilometres southwest of the destroyed reactor, is in the fourth zone — not contaminat­ed enough for resettleme­nt but eligible for subsidies to help with health issues.

Ukraine’s Institute of Agricultur­al Radiology says the most recent testing in the zone showed radiation levels in wild-grown food such as nuts, berries and mushrooms were two to five times higher than what is considered safe.

However, Ukraine’s economy has since been weakened by separatist war in its eastern industrial heartland, endemic corruption and the loss of Crimea, which was annexed by Russia. Last year, the Ukrainian government, which is propped up by billions of dollars in loans from the United States, the European Union and the World Bank, cut off paying for school lunches in Zone 4. There are no official cost figures, but a typical price of about 20 hryvnia (80 U.S. cents) would put the program’s funding at about $50 million a year.

“Hot meals in the schools were the only clean food, which was tested for radiation, for the children,” teacher Natalya Stepanchuk said. “Now the children have gone over to the local food, over which there is absolutely no control.”

In 2012, the government halted the monitoring of radioactiv­e contaminat­ion of food and soil in Zone 4, which was called the “zone of strict radioecolo­gical control.” The state has also cancelled a program for buying Ferocin, known as Prussian Blue, a substance farmers could give their cattle to hasten the eliminatio­n of the cesium-137 isotope. Without financial help, farmers in the area are unwilling to buy it on their own. “The government spends huge funds for the treatment of the local population, but cannot put out a little money on prevention,” said Valery Kashparov, head of the Ukrainian Institute of Agricultur­al Radiology. “I am ashamed to look people in the eye.”

In the view of Vitaly Petruk, head of the agency that administer­s the “ex- clusion zones” closest to the Chernobyl plant, the decision on the school lunches came down to how best to use limited funds.

“What is better: to give all the money to people who have radiation sickness and save them, or split the money . . . and give each of them four hryvnia?” he asked.

“The idea was to focus on certain things, rather than dissipate energy and waste money.”

This calculatio­n means that many in the village of about 350 people go without food. And beyond Zalyshany, there are some 1,300 settlement­s in the zone where the lunches were cancelled. Even when the lunches were available, children were probably eating contaminat­ed food when out of school.

Nine-year-old Olesya Petrova’s mother is sick with cancer and can no longer work. Olesya hungrily awaits the coming of warm weather, when she can scour the woodlands for berries and other goodies.

In the meantime, she can hope that one of her classmates will slip her a sandwich. But in economical­ly depressed Zalyshany, such largesse is fitful.

The lunch cancellati­ons did not affect kindergart­ens, such as the one that’s in the same building as the local school. The kindergart­en’s cook, Lyubov Shevchuk, sometimes slips the older children a little something.

“Children faint and fall. I try to at least give them some hot tea, or take from one child to give to another,” she said.

With no government agency taking responsibi­lity for feeding the schoolchil­dren, it’s left to warm-hearted efforts like Shevchuk’s or to charities. An Italian group, Mondo in Cammino, took notice of the Zone 4 lunch cancellati­ons and raised money to supply the 130 pupils in one village, Radynka, with a year’s lunches at a cost of 15,000 euros ($17,000).

“We know that Ukraine is near default. They decided that these families were no longer children of Chernobyl,” said the organizati­on’s director, Massimo Bonfatti.

The overall effects of radioactiv­e fallout remain intensely debated.

 ?? MSTYSLAV CHERNOV PHOTOS/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Viktoria Vetrova’s sons Bogdan, left, and Kolya, eat at home in Zalishany, Ukraine. Eight-year-old Bogdan suffers from an enlarged thyroid and Vetrov suspects it’s caused by contaminat­ed food.
MSTYSLAV CHERNOV PHOTOS/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Viktoria Vetrova’s sons Bogdan, left, and Kolya, eat at home in Zalishany, Ukraine. Eight-year-old Bogdan suffers from an enlarged thyroid and Vetrov suspects it’s caused by contaminat­ed food.
 ??  ?? Viktoria Vetrova keeps two cows in order to help feed her four children. Her village is in one of the sections of Ukraine contaminat­ed by radioactiv­e fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear explosion in 1986.
Viktoria Vetrova keeps two cows in order to help feed her four children. Her village is in one of the sections of Ukraine contaminat­ed by radioactiv­e fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear explosion in 1986.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada