Maybe she could do better, but he probably knows her well
A study found that if two people were friends before they became a couple, the fact one is better looking than the other doesn’t matter so much
You’ve probably come across those couples where one partner is significantly more attractive than the other. It’s often fodder for fictional comedy — think of oafish Homer and demure Marge in The Simpsons, Peter and Lois Griffin in Family Guyor a fake article in the Onion. In real life, of course, it’s also a source of pain for some couples, who may be hurt and embarrassed to hear that their partner “could do so much better than you.”
While there are all kinds of variations within partners, mixed-attractiveness couples do go somewhat against the grain. We’re often cautioned that real beauty is found within, but good looks are among the more highly-rated characteristics in what people say they want in a romantic partner. And in general, couples tend to be more similar in many respects — including their genetics, physical attractiveness and cultural characteristics such as religion, politics and socioeconomic status — than two randomly selected people would be.
Scientists call this “assortative mating,” and it’s a principle that has been studied for over a century. As early as 1903, scientists reported similarities in the height and arm length of couples.
There are various theories for why people sort themselves out into similar pairs. One is competition: As individuals contend for the most desirable mates, they end up being constrained by their own characteristics.
So someone who is just moderately attractive would love to end up with a supermodel, but competition from other good-looking people means they’ll probably end up with someone whose looks are on the same level. But there are other theories as well, for example, that people just prefer or are more likely to meet others who are more similar to them.
In a study published last year in the journal Psychological Science, research- ers offered a fascinating explanation for when and where couples of mixed attractiveness are most likely to arise. The study’s psychologists, from the University of Texas at Austin and Northwestern University, asked 167 heterosexual couples how long they had known each other and whether they were friends before dating, and had a third party rate each persons’ attractiveness. They found that heterosexual couples who were friends before they dated were more likely to be rated at different attractiveness levels.
In general, the correlation between the man’s and the woman’s attractiveness ratings were relatively high, and those who met each other and started dating within a month had relatively similar levels of attractiveness. But the longer the couple knew each other before they started dating, the less likely they were to be matched for attractiveness. For couples who knew each for more than nine months before they started dating, the researchers found no significant correlation in their attractiveness.
The study also showed no correlation between the couples’ similarity in attractiveness and their relationship satisfaction. Past studies have produced contradictory results on this point, the authors say.
What is the reason for this effect? The researchers still stand by the “market” explanation — that in an environment where people compete for the best mate, they will tend to end up with someone with relatively similar characteristics to themselves.
However, when the people get to know each other first, perhaps by being friends of friends, or studying at the same school, they learn unique information about other characteristics that may influence someone’s desirability — and thus form an opinion of their partner that is different from the pack.