Toronto Star

$1B spike in subway cost may not be the end of it

Work on Scarboroug­h stop design has barely started, so ‘wide variance’ is possible

- With files from Jennifer Pagliaro and Betsy Powell BEN SPURR

After a $1-billion spike in cost of the Scarboroug­h subway extension, Mayor John Tory is defending the latest estimate for the transit project as reliable. But experts warn the subway hasn’t been studied enough to know what the final price tag will be.

The updated cost estimate for the 6-kilometre subway tunnel from Kennedy station to Scarboroug­h Town Centre is $3.2 billion. The number was revealed in a city report published Tuesday, and is roughly $300 million higher than the $2.9- billion figure the mayor defended last week, which in turn was $900 million more than the $2-billion estimate presented to councillor­s in 2013 when they voted to extend the Bloor-Danforth line farther into Scarboroug­h.

The most recent number accounts for the $289-million cost of extending the life of the Scarboroug­h RT during the constructi­on of the subway tunnel and then decommissi­oning the aging line, an expense that wasn’t included in last week’s $2.9billion estimate.

Asked whether he could guarantee the cost won’t jump again, Tory said, “I can’t guarantee the sun will come up tomorrow.” But he stressed the latest figure is “is a more reliable number than we had before.”

He said that at the time of the 2013 council vote, the cost estimate “was basically drawn out of a hat” because city and TTC staff had done no detailed design work. Tory said staff have now undertaken more of that work and produced a more accurate figure.

Although the cost of the extension is higher than previously thought, Tory declared: “It doesn’t change my determinat­ion to build it because I think it is something that is going to connect up a part of the city that is not properly connected to higherorde­r transit, and that has suffered as a result in terms of jobs and investment, in places where we need those jobs and we need that investment.”

But experts caution that the subway extension must undergo further study to produce a more accurate estimate. According to the city report, the $3.2-billion estimate is based on a subway design that is only 5-per-cent complete.

The report notes that according to industry guidelines, at that stage cost estimates can be off by 35 per cent.

“You still have quite a wide variance at that point on cost, because you haven’t found a lot of the problems,” said Lee Sims, director of transporta­tion for IBI Group, a consulting firm.

Issues that could escalate costs include the discovery of difficult soil conditions and buried utilities, Sims said, which is why planners usually add a sizable contingenc­y to cost estimates at the 5-per-cent design level. He added that while it’s possible costs could decrease as design work proceeds, it’s not common.

Councillor Jon Burnside (Ward 26, Don Valley West) said the ballooning subway cost has left him questionin­g whether it would be wise to go back to the $1.48-million, seven-stop LRT plan council scrapped in 2013.

The surface line would have run from Kennedy station to Sheppard Ave. and been fully funded by the province.

Burnside, a rookie councillor who frequently votes with the mayor, said he was concerned the subway costs could increase again. “The fundamenta­l question for me is, is the subway the way to go?” he said. “Can we afford it, given that we have a lot of other transit priorities?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada