Liberals alter controversial Tory policy

Women’s advocacy groups eligible for federal funding

OTTAWA— Status of Women Canada will soon allow groups advocating for women and girls to receive federal project funding, reversing a controversial policy the previous Conservative government brought in nearly a decade ago.

“Our women have told us over and over that’s what they need — an advocate,” said Dawn Lavell-Harvard, president of the Native Women’s Association of Canada, one of the groups that has struggled under the current rules.

The government quietly revealed changes to the eligibility requirements for its women’s program funding in an email Friday that invited select organizations to join Status of Women Minister Patty Hajdu in celebrating the news sometime early next month.

The email, obtained by The Canadian Press, said the changes will come into effect July 1.

The Conservative government of Stephen Harper drastically changed the mandate and operation of Status of Women Canada soon after coming to power a decade ago, saying they wanted to move toward results-oriented projects.

Beginning in October 2006, organizations were no longer able to get federal funding for projects that involved advocacy work, general research or lobbying the government.

“It was, in effect, a silencing of any kind of voice of advocacy for the very people who need it the most,” Lavell-Harvard said.

Her organization also saw the Conservatives cut funding to its Sisters in Spirit project, which included collecting the names of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls years before the RCMP created its database of nearly 1,200 cases.

Leonie Roux, a spokeswoman for Status of Canada, would not comment on the change Friday because it was not intended to be made public.

She confirmed the new rules do not yet include giving organizations money for general research, but that is under review because the 2016 budget boosted money for that purpose.

“We are now in the process of creating a dedicated research and evaluation unit to support evidence-based, innovative research that will help inform our decisions,” Roux wrote in an email.

Monica Lysack was with the Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada when it lost much of its funding under changes in 2006. The impact went well beyond the money, she said.

“It sort of created this feeling of paranoia, where organizations would get called about how much advocacy they should be doing and whether they should be registered as lobbyists,” said Lysack.