Toronto Star

Watchdog ends case against police over suicide-attempt data

Sharing sensitive details with U.S border patrol at issue

- OLIVER SACHGAU STAFF REPORTER

Ontario’s Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er has dropped the case against Toronto police over their practice of letting U.S. border cops access sensitive informatio­n about suicide attempts.

Toronto police used to automatica­lly share informatio­n about interactio­ns with individual­s in an RCMP-run national database called the Canadian Police Informatio­n Centre. U.S border police have access to CPIC, and through it, could see informatio­n on attempted suicides.

This led to Ontarians being refused entry into the United States because of attempted suicides on their record, a practice Ontario’s previous privacy commission­er, Ann Cavoukian, called “perplexing” and “indiscrimi­nant.”

It also led to an unpreceden­ted decision by Cavoukian to seek a court order against Toronto police to stop the sharing. Current commission­er Brian Beamish announced Tuesday that his office has come to an agreement after working on changes to protocol with the Toronto Police Service and the Toronto Police Services Board.

The developmen­t comes almost a year after Toronto Police announced changes to the way U.S. border police access Canadians’ records, in response to a high-profile report and Star investigat­ion into the issue.

In one high-profile case, Ellen Richardson, a woman who was travelling to New York City for a cruise in 2013, was denied entry into the country after being hospitaliz­ed the previous year.

In August 2015, following the commission­er’s announceme­nt of legal action, Toronto police developed a new CPIC function that blocked U.S. border police from seeing certain informatio­n.

Toronto Police spokesman Mark Pugash said the force recognizes the problems inherent in sharing all the informatio­n with U.S. border police.

“There were people who raised genuine and important privacy concerns and civil liberty concerns, and we acted on those concerns,” he said.

Abby Deshman, a lawyer and the public safety and policing director for the Canadian Civil Liberties Associatio­n, said the group was happy with today’s announceme­nt, but wants Toronto police to go further.

“Today’s settlement is really limited in some important ways. It only addresses suicide-related mental health contacts with the police,” she said, adding other mental-health interactio­ns with police are still shared with the border patrol. For example, someone who attempts suicide while in police custody will still have that informatio­n shared.

“The very marginal, slim possibilit­y that this is useful informatio­n, for us is vastly outweighed by the very real discrimina­tion and prejudice that people are facing,” she said.

Pugash said that if members of the CCLA have issues with the policy, they can have those conversati­ons with the Toronto Police Service.

“If they have concerns, then by all means they should raise them with us. I think our work in this area shows we’re receptive and willing,” he said.

The CCLA has voiced those concerns, Deshman said, but had hoped the court case would address them. Now that the case is dropped, the associatio­n will be trying to change the policy in other ways, she said.

“We really feel there is very little justificat­ion to share this kind of informatio­n,” she said. For individual­s who faced discrimina­tion, “it’s extremely traumatizi­ng to those people to be put through that process.” With files from Wendy Gillis

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada