Toronto Star

Can Republican­s fire Trump? Probably not

‘No precedent’ and vague rules make it hard to replace nominee after convention

- JEREMY W. PETERS THE NEW YORK TIMES

We are in the midst of yet another of Donald Trump’s self-inflicted spirals of terrible news.

And with prominent Republican­s saying they will back Hillary Clinton and others announcing this week that they won’t endorse Trump, there has been yet another round of speculatio­n about how the party could get rid of him.

But it almost certainly can’t. And even if it could, it probably wouldn’t be worth the effort. Here’s why.

Republican­s are stuck with him Under Republican Party rules, Trump is the only one who can take himself out of the race at this point. The only provision that exists, Rule 9, was written to apply only in the event of a candidate’s death or refusal to run. Then the 168-member Republican National Committee — a body made up of the men and women from each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five territorie­s — would be able to name a new nominee by a majority vote. Each state and jurisdicti­on is given the same number of votes as delegates it has to the national convention, so the system favours larger Republican-dominated states. There is, however, some air in the rule — which actually spells out how to fill a vacancy “by reason of death, declinatio­n or otherwise” — that an enterprisi­ng lawyer could try to exploit. But arguing that Trump’s nomination can be rescinded by second-guessing party bosses over the word “otherwise” seems highly improbable.

Replacing him would be a mess Even if Trump withdrew as the nominee, replacing him after the convention is uncharted and potentiall­y messy territory. “The rules are vague, and there is no precedent,” said Benjamin L. Ginsberg, a lawyer with Jones Day who has worked on multiple Republican presidenti­al campaigns. Naming someone would be hard enough. Finding a suitable alternativ­e was always the problem with the “Never Trump” movement. No matter how distastefu­l party leaders found him, they could never agree on anyone else. Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana, Trump’s running mate, would seem to have a strong claim to make because he is the only other Republican formally nominated by his party.

But what if others, rivals of Trump from the primaries like Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, decided they deserved a shot? A new candidate would almost certainly not be chosen by acclamatio­n. And determinin­g who and how many are eligible would be a huge fight — one the Republican National Committee would have to resolve before it could ultimately vote.

Time is running out Given that the process of replacing the Republican nominee would probably not go smoothly or quickly — what has for Republican­s this year? — there would be very little time left for other essential aspects of a presidenti­al campaign. One of the issues is ballot access. Each state has its own set of rules and deadlines for getting on the ballot, which Trump and Pence have done. Getting their names off and the names of the new presidenti­al and vice-presidenti­al candidates on would be a logistical and legal headache. Some states, including important battlegrou­nd ones like Iowa, start voting next month. Legal and logistical complicati­ons aside, how would a candidate run a campaign under such a compressed timeline? One thing is for sure: He or she would almost certainly not have the name recognitio­n Trump has. Convincing the country’s voters that they should elect you president is an undertakin­g that requires months, not weeks.

 ?? DARREN HAUCK/GETTY IMAGES ?? Even if Donald Trump withdrew as the Republican nominee, replacing him after the convention is uncharted and potentiall­y messy territory.
DARREN HAUCK/GETTY IMAGES Even if Donald Trump withdrew as the Republican nominee, replacing him after the convention is uncharted and potentiall­y messy territory.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada