Toronto Star

Liberals considered a tax on soda pop

Government asked for input, but didn’t include the controvers­ial move in budget

- ANDY BLATCHFORD AND JIM BRONSKILL THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA— The federal government has weighed the pros and cons of a financial deterrent aimed at shrinking bulging waistlines: a tax on soda pop.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s office requested an internal analysis last winter to explore the “issues and impacts in respect of a potential tax on soft drinks.”

The informatio­n was contained in a Jan. 29 briefing note prepared for Morneau as he drew up the Liberal government’s maiden budget, which was tabled in March.

“A number of health organizati­ons have called on the government to implement taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), as a strategy to address obesity,” reads the memo signed by deputy finance minister Paul Rochon.

The partially redacted, “secret” briefing was obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Informatio­n Act. As an example, the document pointed to a prebudget recommenda­tion made by the Heart and Stroke Foundation, which urged Ottawa to impose a tax of five cents per 100 millilitre­s on sugar-sweetened beverages.

The Heart and Stroke Foundation told Ottawa that such a levy would be a sustainabl­e source of tax revenue that would generate $1.8 billion every year for the public treasury.

In Morneau’s spring budget, the Liberal government pledged to help “families make better food choices” and indicated it would take steps during 2016-17 to add more details on food labels about added sugars and artificial dyes in processed products.

The budget made no mention of imposing taxes on sugary or fatty foods and beverages.

Asked about the analysis, a spokeswoma­n for Morneau said it was requested during the prebudget period when the finance minister’s office was in explorator­y mode and had a responsibi­lity to examine options and proposals.

“This (is) an issue that was raised in the prebudget consultati­on period by several stakeholde­rs — both for and against — and we asked for an analysis in order to better understand it,” Annie Donolo said in an email.

“We encourage anyone with a point of view to engage with us. It’s an important subject with many facets, and we expect it will come up again as we hear from people ahead of the next year’s budget.”

The push to tax sugar-filled bever- ages has gained momentum in recent months.

In its prebudget submission, the Heart and Stroke Foundation said health experts have described sugary drinks as a “significan­t driver of chronic disease and obesity.” It also insisted that taxing sugary drinks has cut down on consumptio­n in some jurisdicti­ons.

In March, a Senate committee released a report about fighting obesity that recommende­d Ottawa explore the possibilit­y of implementi­ng a new tax on sugar-sweetened and artificial­ly-sweetened beverages.

Citing the Senate report, members of the Green party voted last weekend in support of a resolution that stated a Green government would introduce a tax on these sweetened drinks. “It makes sense in public policy because it is a burden on our health-care system — so, if you want to look at dollars and cents it makes sense financiall­y,” Green Leader Elizabeth May said before the vote.

However, the Canadian Beverage Associatio­n has opposed any plan to tax sugar-sweetened and artificial­ly sweetened drinks.

The associatio­n, which represents 60,000 workers in the industry, has said that efforts to tax these products have proven ineffectiv­e in reducing consumptio­n in other jurisdicti­ons. It also warned it would increase the cost of groceries.

 ?? EDUARDO VERDUGO/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Canada’s federal government weighed the pros and cons of introducin­g a soda pop tax, but didn’t propose one.
EDUARDO VERDUGO/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Canada’s federal government weighed the pros and cons of introducin­g a soda pop tax, but didn’t propose one.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada