Toronto Star

NEW ROMANTICS

The classic rom-com is becoming a hyperlocal cultural product,

- ANN HORNADAY THE WASHINGTON POST

It’s a truth universall­y acknowledg­ed that, as a genre, the romantic comedy is moribund, kaput, over, deader than John Corbett’s eyes in My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2.

This is a lament most often heard among filmgoers of a certain age, viewers whose formative movie experience­s were the classics of romantic comedy’s boomer-era golden age of the 1980s and 1990s, films that included Moonstruck, Working Girl, When Harry Met Sally, Sleepless in Seattle, My Best Friend’s Wedding. A confession: I’m one of millions of middle-aged people, mostly women, who will watch Hugh Grant stammer his way through Notting Hill when it pops up on cable, no matter what the hour or how long the movie has been underway. Hearing a few bars from “Love Is All Around” in a supermarke­t is still enough to send me into a Four Weddings and a Funeral- inspired reverie.

It’s not that movies have entirely given up on the specific joys of the rom-com: the attractive stars at its centre, the yummy wardrobes and soundtrack­s, the aspiration­al interiors, the reassuring plot lines of attraction, courtship, breakup, makeup and reunion with or without wedding cake.

Music and Lyrics, the 2007 movie starring Drew Barrymore and Grant (doing a hilariousl­y self-referentia­l parody of ’90s nostalgia) still holds up over repeated viewings, as does 2009’s The Proposal, with Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds. And, bless her heart, Reese Witherspoo­n has reportedly signed on to star in Home Again, written and directed by Hallie Meyers-Shyer, daughter of rom-com queen Nancy Meyers, who bestowed such riches as Something’s Gotta Give and The Holiday upon her grateful subjects.

These occasional beau gestes notwithsta­nding, the kind of rom-com we talk about when we talk about rom-coms seems to have largely disappeare­d from the cinematic landscape, a casualty of shifting audience expectatio­ns, a Hollywood business model predicated on comic books and video games and social changes that make most of the classic boy-meets-girl plots seem hopelessly white, heteronorm­ative and unforgivab­ly retrograde.

Which is why, when Bridget Jones’s Baby opened last month, I and fellow rom-com fans dared to ask: could it be that our beloved genre had climbed its way back from irrelevanc­e?

The answer, it turned out, was yes and no. And that equivocati­on itself contained a lesson about how the genre will probably survive in the 21st century.

While Bridget Jones’s Baby, the third in a series of movies focused on a lovelorn couple played by Renée Zellweger and Colin Firth, has been considered a non-starter in the United States, it’s become an unquestion­ed hit in the United Kingdom, where the movie is set, where author Helen Fielding wrote the original Bridget Jones books and where Jane Austen wrote the novels that Fielding based her characters on. (The film has been such a smash that it recently made its parent studio, Working Title Films, the first British film company to make $1billion U.S.)

As such a geographic­ally specific success, Bridget Jones’s Baby turns out to be of a piece with a wider trend, wherein the classic rom-com as we know it has become an increasing­ly homegrown commodity.

As American studios seek to win over huge foreign markets with movies that overcome the language barrier (goodbye flirty banter, hello big bang-booms), the rom-com is now less a function of mass entertainm­ent than a hyperlocal cultural product, with individual film industries creating their own iterations of the classic wish-fulfilment fantasy according to their own mores, traditions, in-jokes and taboos.

In other words, the rom-com isn’t dead as much as it’s been appropriat­ed, adapted and redistribu­ted in a sort of sky burial across the cinematic universe.

In China, the Holy Grail of market-hungry Hollywood studios, recent hits include Finding Mr. Right, an ode to Nora Ephron’s classic Sleepless in Seattle larded with China-specific references to the Beijing wealth boom and “birth tourism,” and its semi-sequel, Book of Love, which earned a whopping $53.4 million when it opened in May. In South Korea, the rom-com blockbuste­r was 2001’s My Sassy Girl, which included nods to that country’s drinking culture and a classic Korean short story, and has been remade in several countries, including the U.S.; in Vietnam, the romantic comedy Sweet 20 broke records earlier this year as the country’s highestgro­ssing local film ever.

Nigeria produces its own versions of the rom-com, as do such robust film markets as India, Brazil and Russia.

Seen through one lens, this is good news: rather than simply accept U.S. movies as the only culturally imperialis­t game in town, it’s refreshing to see the developmen­t of indigenous cinematic vernacular­s and self-sustaining economic models.

Seen through another lens, however, there are downsides, including the potential for culturally specific films to reinforce repressive attitudes toward men, women and sexual autonomy, not to mention sexual orientatio­n.

What’s more, intense localizati­on can breed insularity, as we’ve already seen in the U.S., where over the past 20 years romantic comedies have been ever more thinly sliced and diced to appeal to specific cultural groups: R-rated raunch-coms ( Bridesmaid­s, Trainwreck) and “rom-action” films ( Date Night, Knight and Day) designed to appeal to guys as much as young women; more genteel movies targeted to older audiences ( It’s Complicate­d and The Intern); movies geared toward gay audiences, like the British charmer Weekend.

For decades, white fans have been bemoaning the death of the classic rom-com, apparently unaware that African-American filmmakers were single-handedly keeping the form alive with such classics as Love Jones, Brown Sugar, Love & Basketball and Jumping the Broom.

Of course, it most likely never occurred to Hollywood marketers that white viewers who loved Four Weddings and a Funeral might also swoon to The Best Man. But our own myopia — our inability or unwillingn­ess to see ourselves in characters who don’t necessaril­y look like us — surely plays a role.

If rom-com fans truly care about the genre they claim to love, they should consider expanding their connoisseu­rship beyond their own language, time zone or demographi­c niche, and seek out films that may not have been made or marketed for them but that they can find escapist pleasure in nonetheles­s.

Love is all around and rom-coms are, too. We just need to widen our gaze to find them.

 ??  ??
 ?? GILES KEYTE/UNIVERSAL PICTURES ?? The success of the British film Bridget Jones’s Baby shows that the classic rom-com has become an increasing­ly homegrown commodity.
GILES KEYTE/UNIVERSAL PICTURES The success of the British film Bridget Jones’s Baby shows that the classic rom-com has become an increasing­ly homegrown commodity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada