Toronto Star

Smart pharmacare strategy an urgent national priority

- STEVE LONG Steve Long is a senior associate in health and life sciences at Global Public Affairs. A pharmacist and former executive director of pharmaceut­ical funding and guidance at Alberta Health, Long principall­y focuses on health policy developmen­t, i

Today’s disjointed pharmaceut­ical policy may be described as a Shakespear­ean tragedy — a flawed system that will always end with demise.

The relationsh­ip between health-care policies, the funding of prescripti­on drugs and public access to medically necessary medication is fragmented. It is in need of political leadership. With the provincial, territoria­l and federal health ministers meeting in Toronto this week, the time has come to discuss the details of a National Prescripti­on Drug Strategy. How are we going to move this forward?

Global Public Affairs’ recent report, “National Pharmacare: Lost in Translatio­n,” outlined the players on the stage and how their competing interests affect Canadians’ access to prescripti­on medication­s.

The public values its health and improvemen­t to quality of life. Employers seek increased productivi­ty associated with healthy employees. Government­s want improved population health, individual satisfacti­on and health-system sustainabi­lity.

The pharmaceut­ical industry wants market access for products that are valued by patients and payers alike to generate returns and to support ongoing and future research.

Private insurance providers aim to minimize the number of clients on long-term disability and prevent the emergence or recurrence of health problems.

And health profession­als want to cure illness and reduce suffering. These goals and desires are not mutually exclusive and yet our current system fails to meet many Canadians’ expectatio­ns. Understand­ably so — it is, after all, everyone for themselves. The current system operates without common goals. But as there are no directors, not all actors are treated fairly and equitably.

The result is a tragedy. There is inequitabl­e, unpredicta­ble access to effective, necessary prescripti­on medicines. There’s a reason why this is happening.

Today’s prescripti­on medicines are a key tool to restore and maintain health. When prescribed and taken appropriat­ely they reduce other health-system costs, help individual­s avoid hospitaliz­ation and support Canadians to function effectivel­y in their daily lives. Prescripti­on medication­s help treat and cure patients with acute illnesses and delay progressio­n for those with chronic diseases.

Canadians spend more than $29 billion annually on prescripti­on medication­s. After hospitals, it is the second-largest component of health-care spending, exceeding physician services. This spending occurs outside of the principles of the Canada Health Act, and too often at arms-length from the rest of the health system.

There is limited and inconsiste­nt integratio­n of medication-use data with physician visits, hospitaliz­ations or care planning. The result is a poor understand­ing of the impact pharmaceut­icals have on patient outcomes or the value they offer to the health-care system.

It’s fair to argue that all Canadians want equitable access to effective medication­s without incurring financial hardship. Yet, increasing­ly, access is compromise­d due to ability to pay, employment status, clinical condition or disease, age, ethnic heritage or even one’s postal code.

There is an overall lack of accountabi­lity.

So, how do we focus on a common goal when there are disparate and competing interests operating in a complex, imperfect system?

Because of the dominant position public payers have in funding prescripti­on medication­s in Canada, strong, principled political leadership is required to ensure the system delivers consistent value for all Canadians.

Federal Health Minister Jane Philpott, who has responsibi­lity for Health Canada, the agency that approves medicines for sale in Canada, has a role in balancing access to existing and new medicines while ensuring patient safety. The federal government also has the ability to rebalance tax credits and insured health benefits to reposition the $29 billion in annual spending.

Through shifts, Ottawa could make more direct dollars available to the provinces for consistent, national access to appropriat­ely prescribed drugs, including both valued existing products and new, innovative medicines.

Through the creation of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceut­ical Alliance, and their existing drug plans, provincial ministers of health now have additional tools to improve access to medication­s and create greater value for Canadians. Their focus should include more timely and predictabl­e assessment­s, access and funding when a product’s value has been demonstrat­ed.

They should also build greater accountabi­lity for appropriat­e use. They must continue to seek ways to increase efficiency, measure value and measure outcomes that result from better integratio­n of medication­s with other components of the health system.

Finally, both levels of government need to work smarter and more co-operativel­y. Granted, this will take time, but industry, physicians, pharmacist­s, employers and patients can’t start doing the heavy lifting without direction from the federal and provincial health ministers.

Canadians must work together to address our fatal flaw.

Increasing­ly, access to effective drugs is compromise­d by ability to pay, employment status, age, ethnic heritage or even one’s postal code

 ?? JACQUES BOISSINOT/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Canadians spend more than $29 billion annually on prescripti­on medication­s, second only to hospitals in health-care spending.
JACQUES BOISSINOT/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO Canadians spend more than $29 billion annually on prescripti­on medication­s, second only to hospitals in health-care spending.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada