Toronto Star

Kellogg paid experts on ‘Breakfast Council’

Company fed talking points to the dietitians who guide its nutrionion­al efforts

- CANDICE CHOI

NEW YORK— On its website, Kellogg touted a distinguis­hed-sounding “Breakfast Council” of “independen­t experts” who helped guide its nutritiona­l efforts.

Nowhere did it say this: The maker of Froot Loops and Frosted Flakes paid the experts and fed them talking points, according to a copy of a contract and emails obtained by The Associated Press.

The company paid the experts an average of $13,000 a year, prohibited them from offering media services for products “competitiv­e or negative to cereal” and required them to engage in “nutrition influencer out- reach” on social media or with colleagues, and report back on their efforts.

“I’m still feeling great from my bowl of cereal & milk this morning! Mini-Wheats are my fave,” a council member posted during a Twitter chat with Kellogg about the benefits of cereal. Kellogg introduced the dietitian as a “Breakfast Council Member.”

Without noting her relationsh­ip with Kellogg, another council member and dietitian chimed in to say Mini-Wheats were her favourite, too. She included a photo of Frosted Mini-Wheats.

For Kellogg, the Breakfast Council — in existence between 2011 and this year — deftly blurred the lines between cereal promotion and impartial nutrition guidance. The company used the council to teach a continuing education class for dietitians, publish an academic paper on break- fast and try to influence the U.S. government’s dietary guidelines.

The Kellogg’s Breakfast Council included a professor of nutrition, a pediatrici­an and dietitians. Kellogg said the council’s activities were clearly sponsored.

Yoni Freedhoff, an obesity expert at the University of Ottawa who writes about industry influence in nutrition, said he did not believe it was clear to the public that the council members were compensate­d, especially since Kellogg described them as “independen­t.”

“It’s not an automatic leap. I don’t think people think about these conflicts that deeply,” he said.

Dayle Hayes, a dietitian who participat­ed in the Twitter chat in 2014, said in an email that she prides herself on her ethics and transparen­cy, and that her disclosure practices have changed with evolving stan- dards. Based on current standards, she said she would include the word “ad” in tweets referencin­g Kellogg products. She said she did not share any informatio­n without appropriat­e disclosure­s.

Sylvia Klinger, the dietitian who shared the photo of Mini-Wheats, did not respond to requests for comment.

Kellogg Co. said it used the council for academic insight and guidance. It said the experts contribute­d to most of the materials they shared and that they disclosed their affiliatio­n in public engagement­s. Still, the company said it could see how its descriptio­n of the experts as “independen­t” could create confusion. It later told The Associated Press it had been reviewing its nutrition work and decided not to continue the council.

The Breakfast Council page is no longer online.

Kellogg also supplied the experts with a “tool kit” of tweets for a promotiona­l event in New York. When the council members received an email from someone they did not know criticizin­g their work with Kellogg, the company suggested a response for that, too.

 ?? CANDICE CHOI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Kellogg’s “independen­t” experts were paid an average of $13,000 a year.
CANDICE CHOI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO Kellogg’s “independen­t” experts were paid an average of $13,000 a year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada