Toronto Star

Solving the mystery of the ‘tsunami of molasses’

Harvard University students tackle bizarre disaster that killed 21 people a century ago

- ERIN MCCANN THE NEW YORK TIMES

“A dull muffled roar gave but an instant’s warning before the top of the tank was blown into the air,” the New York Times wrote in 1919. “Two million gallons of molasses rushed over the streets and converted into a sticky mass the wreckage of several small buildings which had been smashed by the force of the explosion.”

“Wagons, carts, and motor trucks were overturned. A number of horses were killed. The street was strewn with debris intermixed with molasses and all traffic was stopped.”

It was January. The place was Boston. And when 8.7 million litres of molasses burst from a gigantic holding tank in the city’s North End, 21 people were killed and about 150 more were left injured. The wave of syrup — some reports said it was more than 10 metres tall — rushed through the waterfront, destroying buildings, overturnin­g vehicles and pushing a firehouse off its foundation.

For nearly 100 years, no one really knew why the spill was so deadly.

But at a meeting of the American Physical Society last month, a team of scientists and students presented what may be an important piece of the century-old puzzle. They concluded that when a shipment of molasses newly arrived from the Caribbean met the cold winter air of Massachuse­tts, the conditions were ripe for a calamity to descend upon the city.

By studying the effects of cold weather on molasses, the researcher­s determined that the disaster was more fatal in the winter than it would have been during a warmer season. The syrup moved quickly enough to cover several blocks within seconds and thickened into a harder goo as it cooled, slowing down the wave but also hindering rescue efforts.

“It’s a ridiculous thing to imagine, a tsunami of molasses drowning the North End of Boston, but then you look at the pictures,” said Shmuel Rubinstein, a Harvard professor whose students investigat­ed the disaster.

When the molasses arrived in Boston’s harbour, it was heated by just a few degrees. The warmer temperatur­e made it less viscous and therefore easier to transport to a storage tank near the waterfront.

When the tank burst two days later, the molasses was still probably about 4 or 5 C warmer than the surroundin­g air, said Nicole Sharp, an aerospace engineer and science communicat­ions expert who advised the Harvard students.

The students performed experiment­s in a walk-in refrigerat­or to model how corn syrup, standing in for the molasses, would behave in cold temperatur­es. With that data in hand, they applied the results to a full-scale flood, projecting it over a map of the North End. Their results, Sharp said, generally matched the accounts from the time.

“The historical record says that the initial wave of molasses moved at 35 miles per hour (55 km/h),” Sharp said, “which sounds outrageous­ly fast.”

“At the time, people thought there must have been an explosion in the tank, initially, to cause the molasses to move that fast,” she added.

But after the team ran the experiment­s, she said, it discovered that the molasses could, indeed, move at that speed.

“It’s an interestin­g result,” Sharp said, “and it’s something that wasn’t possible back then. Nobody had worked out those actual equations until decades after the accident.”

If the tank had burst in warmer weather, it would have “flowed far- ther, but also thinner,” Rubinstein said. In the winter, however, after the initial burst — which lasted between 30 seconds and a few minutes, Sharp said — the cooler temperatur­e of the outside air raised the viscosity of the molasses, essentiall­y trapping people who had not been able to escape the wave.

About half the people who were killed “died basically because they were stuck,” Rubinstein said.

A firefighte­r who survived the initial wave managed to stay alive for nearly two hours while he waited to be rescued, they said, but he drowned. “Men and women, their feet trapped by the sticky mass, slipped and fell and were suffocated,” the Boston Globe wrote in 1968. “The stronger tried to save others, and many of them died for their heroism.”

The exact cause of the tank’s failure has never been known. Last year, a team of engineers using modern methods to analyze the century-old disaster blamed poorly designed steel tanks.

The project at Harvard grew out of Rubinstein’s Introducti­on to Fluid Dynamics class, which asks students to create a final project.

“Choose an interestin­g project and make an appealing video,” he said.

Rubinstein and Sharp said they would like to eventually build an entire course around the disaster.

Students could apply what they learn in other classes to understand­ing not just why the molasses behaved the way it did, but also what other forces shaped the events of that day in 1919.

The Boston molasses disaster, Rubinstein said, is “a beautiful story for teaching.”

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? In this Jan. 15, 1919, file photo, the ruins of tanks containing 8.7 million litres of molasses lie in a heap after an eruption that crumpled houses in Boston.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO In this Jan. 15, 1919, file photo, the ruins of tanks containing 8.7 million litres of molasses lie in a heap after an eruption that crumpled houses in Boston.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada