Toronto Star

Green group targets Scarboroug­h trash talk

Privatized east-end collection could send more garbage to landfill, alliance warns

- DAVID RIDER CITY HALL BUREAU CHIEF

An environmen­tal group is urging Toronto council to trash any thoughts of contractin­g out garbage collection in Scarboroug­h.

In a report to be released Friday, Toronto Environmen­tal Alliance (TEA) notes that diversion of waste from landfill to recycling streams has been higher in the east half of Toronto, where city workers still pick up trash, than in the west end, where two private companies have collection contracts.

“Scarboroug­h has the highest waste-diversion rate in Toronto and it’s 4 per cent higher than Etobicoke,” the report states.

“As Toronto’s landfill is reaching capacity and garbage fees are increasing, we know that now, more than ever, diversion rates must go up.

“Since it takes five years to increase the city’s diversion rate by 4 per cent, it’s clearly a significan­t number.”

In Etobicoke, where garbage was contracted out in 1995, diversion rates between 2013 and 2015 ranged from 57 to 59 per cent, according to city figures. In Scarboroug­h, where city workers fill the trucks, the rates were 62 to 63 per cent. The city has a multi-pronged plan to reach 70-percent diversion citywide. TEA says nobody knows why waste diversion is higher in the publicly collected east end, so “it is simply not worth putting Scarboroug­h’s success at risk by contractin­g out.”

Diversion benefits the city both environmen­tally, by sending less trash to Green Lane landfill near London, Ont., and financiall­y, by extending the life of that landfill bought by the city of Toronto a decade ago for $220 million.

This month, Mayor John Tory, who promised in the 2014 election to expand private collection, vowed to convince council to get quotes on Scarboroug­h collection to see if the private sector can do it cheaper and better. CUPE Local 416, representi­ng city collectors, could submit a competitiv­e bid to keep the work, he said.

“The market needs to be tested to see if the same service can be done for less . . .” Tory said at the time.

“The city is presently saving millions of dollars each year by contractin­g out garbage collection in the west end and I want to save money in the east end as well.”

The public works committee has voted in favour of tendering out the work, setting up a showdown next week at city council, which has final say.

Many councillor­s are balking at spending a half-million dollars on the procuremen­t exercise when the latest public data says that not only does public collection in Scarboroug­h send more waste to recycling and compost, it is cheaper per household than in Etobicoke.

Based on 2014 figures, Etobicoke collection cost $142 per household compared to $126.89 in Scarboroug­h.

City staff, who are recommendi­ng a bid process, say the comparison is irrelevant because contractor­s are not paid per household, but per tonne of waste collected.

Jim McKay, the city’s general manager of solid waste services, said Thursday diversion rates are mostly determined by what homeowners put in bins, with “little correlatio­n” to the type of collection service.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada