Toronto Star

Russia accused of violating treaty

Deploying new cruise missile a challenge for Trump in bid for better ties with Soviets

- MICHAEL R. GORDON

WASHINGTON— Russia has secretly deployed a new cruise missile despite complaints from U.S. officials that it violates an arms control treaty that helped seal the end of the Cold War, administra­tion officials say.

The move presents a major challenge for U.S. President Donald Trump, who has vowed to improve relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and to pursue arms accords.

The missile deployment also comes as the Trump administra­tion struggles to fill key policy positions at the State Department and the Pentagon — and to settle on a permanent replacemen­t for Michael Flynn, the national security adviser who resigned Monday. Flynn stepped down after it was revealed he had misled the U.S. vice-president and other U.S. officials over conversati­ons with Moscow’s ambassador to Washington.

The ground-launched cruise missile at the centre of U.S. concerns is one the Obama administra­tion said in 2014 had been tested in violation of a 1987 treaty that bans U.S. and Russian intermedia­te-range missiles based on land.

The Obama administra­tion had tried to get the Russians to correct the violation while the missile was still in the test phase. Instead, the Russians have deployed a fully operationa­l unit.

Administra­tion officials said the Russians now have two battalions of the prohibited cruise missile. One is still at Russia’s missile test site at Kapustin Yar in southern Russia near Volgograd.

The other was shifted in December from that test site to an operationa­l base in the country, according to a senior official who did not provide further details.

U.S. officials had called the cruise missile the SSC-X-8. But the “X” has been removed from intelligen­ce reports, indicating that U.S. intelligen­ce officials consider the missile to be operationa­l and no longer a system in developmen­t.

The missile program has been a major concern for the Pentagon, which has developed options for how to respond, including deploying additional missile defences in Europe or developing air-based or sea-based cruise missiles.

Russia’s actions are politicall­y significan­t It is unlikely the Senate, which is skeptical of Putin’s intentions, would agree to ratify a new strategic arms-control accord unless the alleged violation of the intermedia­te-range treaty is corrected.

Trump has said the U.S. should “strengthen and expand its nuclear capability.” But at the same time, he has talked of reaching a new arms agreement with Moscow that would reduce arms “very substantia­lly.”

Deployment of the system could also substantia­lly increase the military threat to NATO nations, depending on where it is based and how many more batteries are deployed. Jim Mattis, U.S. defence secretary, is to meet with allied defence ministers Wednesday in Brussels.

Before he left his post last year as the NATO commander and retired from the military, Gen. Philip M. Breedlove warned that deployment of the cruise missile would be a militarily significan­t developmen­t that “can’t go unanswered.”

Coming up with an arms-control solution would not be easy. Each missile battalion is believed to have four mobile launchers with about half a dozen nuclear-tipped missiles allocated to each of the launchers.

The Trump administra­tion is in the beginning stages of reviewing nuclear policy and has not said how it plans to respond.

“We do not comment on intelligen­ce matters,” Mark Toner, the acting State Department spokespers­on, said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada