Toronto Star

Let Toronto plan its future

-

Five years ago this month, Toronto city council spoke out clearly on what should be done with the Ontario Municipal Board.

By a resounding vote of 34 to 5, councillor­s sent a message to Queen’s Park: free us from this unelected, unaccounta­ble body that all too often brushes aside attempts to protect neighbourh­oods. Make sure Toronto remains livable as it grows faster than it ever has before.

City council had it right. The best thing the province could do with the OMB would be to liberate Toronto from its domination. The city should be able to chart its own path forward without being held in thrall to this secretive board. It should be given the power to set up its own developmen­t appeals body that would show a lot more respect for decisions made by councillor­s, city planners and ordinary residents.

Unfortunat­ely, according to an in-depth series of articles over the weekend by the Star’s Jennifer Pagliaro, the Wynne government doesn’t intend to follow this sensible and democratic approach.

As it plans a major and long-overdue overhaul of the OMB, the province has reportedly ruled out freeing Toronto from its oversight and letting the city set up its own appeals board to rule on set up its own appeals board to rule on significan­t new developmen­t.

That’s the bad news. And it’s disappoint­ing that after years of discussing reform to the OMB, it appears Queen’s Park still doesn’t think Toronto can be trusted to work out these issues on its own. It’s another example of treating the metropolis of Canada as just one more local burg that has to go cap in hand to the province on issues vital to its future.

Still, there is good news. The province is sending out clear signals it believes the OMB must be seriously reformed. Municipal Affairs Minister Bill Mauro told the Star that the OMB review is a “very serious exercise” and “we’re looking to move in the direction of much more local deference for local decision-making.” Premier Wynne herself acknowledg­es that earlier changes failed to make the OMB show more respect for local decisions, “and so we have to go farther.”

That’s excellent, as far as it goes. Torontonia­ns — from city councillor­s down to neighbourh­ood residents worried about condo towers looming over their backyards — have long complained that the OMB routinely approves mega-developmen­ts in areas of the city that can’t handle them.

All too often, as the Star series demonstrat­ed, it brushes aside months of consultati­ons with local residents and decisions by city planners and councillor­s and rules in favour of developers seeking taller towers and greater density.

It’s encouragin­g that Queen’s Park seems finally to have woken up to this reality, but there’s a closing-the-barn-door quality to its promise to rein in the appeal board. For the past decade Toronto has seen unpreceden­ted growth, and neighbourh­oods like Yonge and Eglinton have been fundamenta­lly reshaped. That developmen­t cannot be undone.

Still, the city’s growth spurt continues unabated and the quicker it can be shaped at the local level, the better. To cite just one example, city council is about to make crucial decisions on developmen­t on the Honest Ed’s site at Bathurst and Bloor, where a series of towers approachin­g 30 storeys is being proposed. That will completely transform another part of the city.

At the very least, the rules governing the OMB should be changed so that it better respects developmen­t decisions taken at the neighbourh­ood and council level. Instead of simply being required to “have regard” for local decisions (as the law stands now), it should overturn those decisions only if city and provincial policies have not been followed.

In other words, the OMB should be an actual appeals body, as city staff have recommende­d. It should not allow developers to overturn local decisions simply by arguing the issues all over again before the board’s appointed members.

The developmen­t industry will fiercely resist such changes, arguing that they will hinder growth. But the pressures for growth and ever-greater density are so great that there’s little chance of that. The province should stick to its guns and make sure local decisionma­king gets more respect. The future character of our city depends on it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada