Toronto Star

Power failure: the cost of harassment

- Penny Collenette

Celebrity power, like political power, is a responsibi­lity, not a right. Abuse of that power can result in severe consequenc­es, both to individual­s and to institutio­ns, as evident in the spectacula­r fall from grace of Bill O’Reilly, the longtime Conservati­ve host of The O’Reilly Factor on Fox News,

Late-night talk-show hosts and comedians savaged O’Reilly in monologues and jokes following the statement by 21st Century Fox (the parent company of Fox News Channel), that O’Reilly would not be returning to the show “after a thorough and careful review of allegation­s.” The New York Times had previously reported that either O’Reilly or Fox News had given $13 million (U.S.) to five women in exchange for their silence about his behaviour. Stephen Colbert deadpanned that “Bill O’Reilly always had your back, and if you were a woman, he might have a go at your front too.” Ouch.

But the discussion delved deeper than jokes. An unusually frank exchange on CNN, between Margaret Hoover and Alisyn Camerota, both former Fox news journalist­s, demonstrat­ed the insidious effect of harassment in a newsroom.

While neither Hoover nor Camerota (who is now a co-host on CNN’s Morning Show) were sexually harassed, Hoover had to “navigate a mine field” to make sure she was never in a vulnerable situation with O’Reilly.

Camerota had experience­d more than one issue with Roger Ailes, the former chairman and CEO of Fox News, who resigned in July 2016 following more allegation­s of sexual harassment. She noted that the real harassment was emotional, caused by bullying, which in turn, created a “chilling effect.”

While the O’Reilly scenario was typical — men in positions of power and prestige belittle, bully and sometimes sexually assault individual­s who are not in a position to fight back — the result was surprising­ly atypical. Third parties, in the form of advertiser­s, proved to be valuable power brokers as many pulled their commercial­s from the show.

Nothing focuses the corporate mind or rattles the C-suite like the loss of revenue. Even the powerful Murdoch-owned network recognized the damage. Not only were they bleeding money, but their takeover bid for Sky News in the U.K. could be impaired. Riley was jettisoned, albeit with a rumoured payout of $25 million, an amount that will cause further angst for the network.

However, the clout of the marketplac­e will not help any political staffers who allege harassment on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. Except for those who work for NDP members, this particular cohort is not unionized — they are answerable only to the MP for whom they work. Most MP/staff relationsh­ips have strong bonds of trust and respect, but that bond does not negate the need for protection in the event of abuse of power.

A policy on preventing and addressing harassment, issued in 2014 by the Board of Internal Economy, is a smart beginning but neverthele­ss, gaps remain. For example, the reporting mechanism is internal (i.e. report to your MP first, which is not helpful if the MP is abusive), rather than to an external, anonymous process. Nor does the code address the delicate issue of harassment between MPs themselves.

A three-piece series in the Hill Times, an independen­t paper covering Parliament Hill, notes that few staffers report sexual harassment, fearing job loss and reputation­al damage. The impetus for the series, which will next focus on the Parliament­ary Press Gallery, came from the allegation­s concerning Senator Don Meredith. And just recently, new allegation­s of workplace harassment have surfaced regarding another senator, Dan Lang.

Abuse of power can cause not only trauma and depression, but it can negatively impact productivi­ty. Surely, Fox News did not want an advertisin­g exodus. Surely, the senators on the Senate Ethics Committee who are considerin­g Senator Meredith’s future, have other issues they would prefer to pursue. And surely, any staffer or journalist who experience­s harassment would find it difficult to do her job properly.

There is no question that harassment charges require fairness and profession­alism. Allegation­s cannot be frivolous because reputation­al damage can equally affect a person in a position of power who is falsely accused.

Neverthele­ss, tough as it may be, the exercise of power requires vigilance to keep it in check. Our Parliament­arians must keep at this issue. We don’t need a Bill O’Reilly on Parliament Hill.

Penny Collenette is an adjunct professor of law at the University of Ottawa and was a senior director of the Prime Minister’s Office for Jean Chrétien.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada