Toronto Star

Corporatiz­ation of Toronto streetscap­e a dead end

- Christophe­r Hume

Wandering the streets of Toronto, there’s little evidence of the diversity the city motto says is our strength.

More than ever, Toronto’s built environmen­t is an instantly familiar landscape of chain stores, fast food franchises and the like. We all know who they are: Shoppers Drug Mart, Starbucks, Tim Hortons, Subway, Pizza Pizza, LCBO outlets . . . One corner now could be any corner. One street now looks like any other street.

Across the city, there’s a growing sense of monotony and sterility. Toronto is being buried beneath layers and layers of corporate branding and the monomaniac­al sameness that lies at its heart, the logos, the standardiz­ed colour schemes, the decor, signage, typeface, uniforms, facades . . . To the corporate mind, this is how a business ingratiate­s itself and ensures that its outlets aren’t just recognizab­le but impossible to ignore. From the civic perspectiv­e, however, it’s an onslaught on everything that makes the city lively and engaging.

Worse still, the condo boom that has remade Toronto has also remade its retail.

The economics of the developmen­t industry have hastened the corporatiz­ation of the city and made it exponentia­lly worse.

Pretty soon, chain stores and fast food outlets will have nothing to compete with but each other

Not only does the urban playing field tilt in favour of big business, it contribute­s significan­tly to the demise of small operators.

It all starts with the form of the 21st-century condo in Toronto; a highrise tower atop a low rise podium.

The former is where developers make their money; the latter is required by the city. Though it seemed a good idea at the time — the base allows for the continuati­on of the streetscap­e — in reality, it has become another way for builders to enhance their profit and spread dullness.

Typically, developers retain ownership of the podium. Because banks prefer large businesses, and only they can afford the rent and sign leases three years in advance, they usually get the space. A developer that can snag, say, a Shoppers and an LCBO has hit the jackpot. Who cares that the city is already lousy with drug marts, more than 300 at last count?

“I just got a call yesterday about a Pizza Pizza that’s coming to College St.,” laments downtown Councillor Mike Layton. “Now Hooters is moving in what was a wonderfull­y authentic Italian restaurant on College. It’s the same five stores at the bottom of every condo.”

Layton, who recently requested a report on how Toronto can stop the chain stores from overrunnin­g the city, looks to examples like San Francisco, which leads the fight against what it calls “formula use retail.”

As that city’s website notes, the “sameness of Formula Retail outlets, while providing clear branding for consumers, counters the general direction of certain land use controls . . . which value unique community character and therefore need controls, in certain areas, to maintain neighbourh­ood individual­ity.”

San Francisco defines chain stores as “a retail sales establishm­ent that has eleven or more . . . establishm­ents in operation . . . anywhere in the world.” They are permitted in some parts of the city, not in others. These rules, written into the San Francisco Planning Code, stand in stark contrast to the situation here, where chains do what they want.

Toronto does have a “character neighbourh­ood” designatio­n, but as Layton points out, “It doesn’t have much planning clout.”

One simple solution would be to force developers to limit the size of retail units so they are too small to suit the chains. Toronto’s most successful streets — King, Queen, College — are lined with narrow storefront­s — four to five metres wide — that can be used and reused through generation­s. But even that would need builders’ co-operation. Then there’s the question of how the Ontario Municipal Board would respond.

Ultimately, this urban homogeniza­tion raises the question of who the city serves — business or people? The answer, of course, is both. But handing the city over to corporate interests helps neither. As Layton asks, “Why would anyone come to Queen St. if the stores are the same here as everywhere?”

Already Queen West is mostly a memory. The chains arrived years ago.

The final irony, of course, is the self-defeating nature of the chain stores’ strategy. Pretty soon, Shoppers Drug Marts will have nothing to compete with but other Shoppers Drug Marts. And how many Starbucks or Tim Hortons do we really need?

Ultimately, the market will decide. And if we’re lucky, the city might have something to say, too. In the meantime, though, Toronto’s streets are fast becoming dead ends.

 ??  ??
 ?? ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR ?? More than ever, Toronto’s streetscap­e is dominated by chains like Shoppers Drug Mart, Starbucks and the LCBO, writes Christophe­r Hume.
ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR More than ever, Toronto’s streetscap­e is dominated by chains like Shoppers Drug Mart, Starbucks and the LCBO, writes Christophe­r Hume.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada