Toronto Star

Union alleges OHL broke labour laws

Board filing escalates battle over whether junior players are employees or amateurs

- ROBERT CRIBB STAFF REPORTER

The Ontario Hockey League illegally undermined a union drive of its players between 2012 and 2014 using “malicious, high-handed conduct,” a prospectiv­e union has alleged in a filing before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Canadian Hockey League Players’ Associatio­n attempted to unionize major junior players in the Ontario Hockey League with a promise of establishi­ng minimum wage payment for work weeks that often exceed full-time hours.

That effort was met with aggressive “disregard for the Canadian judicial system” by league officials who attempted to avoid an employer/employee relationsh­ip with players and “circumvent labour laws, employment standards act and previous court rulings,” reads the applicatio­n, obtained by the Star.

In an email statement Monday, OHL commission­er David Branch said there are “deficienci­es with the applicatio­n not the least of which is that the allegation­s made are completely unfounded and untimely. We will vigorously defend ourselves against this frivolous complaint.”

In the past, he has told the Star that the relationsh­ip between clubs and their players does not amount to employment because the players are considered “amateur athletes.” Union officials counter that provincial labour laws should apply to forprofit hockey clubs generating income from the work of their players.

While OHL players have traditiona­lly been paid stipends — typically less than $500 a month — and received benefits such as lodging, food and hockey gear, they have never been paid in accordance with minimum wage legislatio­n.

The dispute is already at the centre of a $180-million class-action suit filed in 2014 — currently before the courts — alleging the OHL is break- ing minimum wage laws.

At the heart of the CHLPA’s labour board grievance is a 2014 memo from the OHL to its member clubs warning them to stop using any language that would imply an employment relationsh­ip, to stop paying salaries to players and stop issuing tax slips, Workers Compensati­on Board contributi­ons and employment records.

That memo, titled “Update to Administra­tive Policies,” advises clubs that they “do not need to notify (Canada Revenue Agency) that they are no longer withholdin­g and remitting deductions with respect to players.”

The memo instructed teams to disregard a Canada Revenue Agency Federal Court ruling that classified the OHL players as employees, the CHLPA applicatio­n reads.

“This under-handed scheme . . . was meant to try and systemical­ly and maliciousl­y penalize the players from being eligible for minimum wage,” it alleges. CHLPA spokespers­on Randy Gumbley said the league memo resulted in “severe damage” to the prospectiv­e union’s certificat­ion drive and to its reputation with players.

“The fear of repercussi­ons is very big among OHL players,” he said. “That has to stop. Players have a right to unionize without the fear of reprisal.”

Exhibits included with the applicatio­n also show how standard league player contracts changed language detailing the relationsh­ip between players and their clubs.

A 2013 player contract includes the clause, “20-year-old players are considered to be employees and are treated as such” — language that does not appear in subsequent copies of player contracts obtained by the CHLPA and the Star.

The labour board applicatio­n seeks the “automatic certificat­ion of the Canadian Hockey League Players’ Associatio­n (CHLPA) as the recognized bargaining agent for all players in the Ontario Hockey League,” or damages of $175,000 for union drive expenses.

“The board must see fit to not only take appropriat­e legal action, but in this specific case, set a legal precedent to ensure that the unlawful, malicious, high-handed conduct by the respondent­s doesn’t take place again,” it reads. In March, the CHLPA became a member of The World Associatio­n of IceHockey Players’ Unions, a global organizati­on with members across Europe and North America.

Gumbley said his union will launch a new recruitmen­t drive at the end of July in partnershi­p with a larger, more establishe­d union in Canada.

“We’re hoping the labour board will see the injustice that has happened and set a precedent ruling and sanction the OHL so that these actions won’t happen again.”

 ??  ?? OHL commission­er David Branch calls CHL union’s claims “unfounded and untimely.”
OHL commission­er David Branch calls CHL union’s claims “unfounded and untimely.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada