Are rich paying fair share?
“This is a merciless tax grab made even more noxious by the misinformation spun to justify it. Canadians should be outraged.”
JOHN COLLINS BRAMPTON
Re Morneau not swayed by tax-plan backlash, Sept. 6 I am writing in regard to the well-funded backlash against amendments to our tax laws that will finally close a fraction of the loopholes that unduly benefit Canada’s wealthiest citizens.
I am a middle-aged, median-income wage earner who pays his full tax bill every second Thursday. I come from a family of business people and I possess no particular bias against productive entrepreneurs or the genuine spirit of entrepreneurship. In my experience, business owners are primarily motivated by a desire to be their own boss. As proud and independent operators, they would be the last people to come looking for a crutch from government. But that is exactly what successive Liberal and Conservative governments have provided.
Our tax system has become the ultimate insider deal, in which the well-connected consistently rewrite the rules to escape the rational and just responsibilities that should be placed upon them by a progressive income-tax system in a democratic nation. It is beyond any doubt that we have a twotier income-tax system, in which wage and salary earners are routinely expected to pay their full share, while far too many entrepreneurs play by a set of rules concocted for their own benefit.
The Liberal Party ran on a platform of respecting the middle class and I cannot imagine a better opportunity to demonstrate your commitment to that platform than by tackling the egregious and entirely undemocratic imbalance in our tax system.
We need a tax system that puts the needs of the country ahead of the needs of the country club. Will you actually take on that challenge?
If middle-class Canadians had the same attitude toward paying taxes that the people at the top did, our country would be just another bankrupt, basket-case banana republic. Mike Vorobej, Ottawa Canada has finally got economics right. I am seeing more and more Mercedes, BMWs, Lexus, Audis, Range Rovers, Maseratis and Teslas, along with the increasingly frequent Bentleys, Ferraris and Lamborghinis. According to BMO, luxury car sales have increased 37 per cent since 2013.
Just think, years ago, all that money would have been redistributed — wasted! — through a progressive tax system to provide resources for kids with disabilities in school, to reduce health-care wait times, to fight poverty, to support the elderly and so on.
If this is what a free society looks like, then our fiscal policies are right on track. Tax cuts since 2006 redirect $43 billion per year from social programs to individuals, and the top 20 per cent of income earners take 36 per cent of that.
Canada has been lowering the corporate tax rate for years, arguing it stimulates growth. Meanwhile, corporate divestment increases as taxes get lower.
The upside is that those billions of dollars go to wealthy shareholders who pay a fraction of the tax rate on that income than those who actually work for a living.
Which brings us back to the increased number of luxury cars on the road. Well, that and borrowing against home equity, but let’s not burst that bubble. Mark Davidson, Toronto Finance Minister Bill Morneau says, “We don’t want to be in a situation where there are two classes of Canadians: one class that can incorporate, another class that can’t . . .” How very egalitarian. I would like Mr. Morneau to hold that thought and stretch further by creating a level playing field for employees, who are now treated in much different classes depending on whether they are full-time or part-time, unionized or not, among other factors. Chuck Jolliffe, Woodbridge Shame on Finance Minster Bill Morneau for his insidious tax grab from small business.
Two classes of Canadians, you say? Yes, there are two classes, but it is the civil service that his government oversees who are at the high end, with their guaranteed defined-benefit pensions. They and teachers are the only workers with gold-plated retirement benefits that let them retire at age 55.
The other class of Canadians are private-sector workers who, over the years, have been reduced to defined-contribution pensions or small-business owners with no pensions.
This is a merciless tax grab made even more noxious by the misinformation spun to justify it. Canadians should be outraged. Obviously, the government does not have control of the deficit, which has ballooned much higher than stated during the election campaign. The government is now choosing to reduce them via increased taxation rather than self-control.
Small business have created the bulk of jobs for Ontario. Taking more money out of these businesses will reduce future job creation. We need more jobs and fewer taxes, much more than we need photo ops, mendacity and spin. Shame on Morneau and shame on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Hopefully, Canadians will see through this false information.
John Collins, Brampton
Send email to lettertoed@thestar.ca; via Web at thestar.ca/ letters. Include full name, address, phone numbers of sender; only name and city will be published. Letter writers should disclose any personal interest they have in the subject matter. We reserve the right to edit letters, which run 50-150 words.