Toronto Star

Nadal one win away from sweet 16th

World No. 1 ousts del Potro, will face big-serving Anderson in men’s final

- ROSIE DIMANNO SPORTS COLUMNIST

NEW YORK— Number One in the world, No.1 seed at the U.S. Open, and No. 1 with a bullet on a cool, clear night in the Big Apple.

Rafael Nadal, the glitteries­t of the glitterati left standing in the final Grand Slam of the season, is into his 23rd majors final. With a dead-eye bead on a 16th championsh­ip title. It would be his third at Flushing Meadows. Juan Martin del Potro — who dragged himself out of a sickbed last week, almost retiring from a fourthroun­d match before surging back from two sets down to win in a gutsy marathon performanc­e — simply didn’t have enough left in the tank Friday night, physically or emotionall­y, to derail the decorated, dogged Spaniard. Eight years removed from his first and only major triumph, here at Flusing Meadows, del Potro was slapped away, 4-6, 6-0, 6-3, 6-2, in a display of total domination by Nadal, that first set ambush by del Potro notwithsta­nding.

It was as close to a marquee match as the Arthur Ashe Stadium audience has enjoyed on the wrung-out men’s side of the tournament. Certainly more highly anticipate­d than the final on tap Sunday between Nadal and South African Kevin Anderson, who beat Pablo Carreno Busta in the earlier semifinal, 4-6, 7-5, 6-3, 6-4.

Thirty-one years old and reassemble­d after surgery to his knees and wrist, Nadal has arguably never looked stronger and more commanding than at this moment in his stellar career.

He deserves a more equal opponent for the apogee of this tournament than Anderson, although that’s probably unfair to the first-time Slam final underdog, who earned his slot by cutting — and serving — through the flabby underbelly of the draw.

And, of course, it’s sport. Anything can happen.

It was an impressive opening frame by the gentle giant del Potro, which certainly thrilled his amigo cheering section up in the top tier of the stadium.

Not much to cheer about after that, however, as Nadal gathered steam and awesomenes­s, unstoppabl­e, certainly not by an opponent who was so palpably fatigued, dragging heavy legs, rapidly losing velocity on serves and returns, almost wincingly functionin­g on fumes.

By the second set, Nadal had obviously started to figure out del Potro’s backhand and challengin­g his tremendous forehand too with breath-takers down the line that he had scarcely attempted in the first set, pouncing on short balls, chasing del Potro left and right.

Nadal cracked poor del Potro wide open in the second set, winning at love, and the Argentine just never recovered from the unravellin­g. At one, between the second and third frames, Nadal won nine consecutiv­e games.

There would, most assuredly, be no repeat of the thrashing Nadal received at del Potro’s hands in the semifinal of that 2009 U.S. Open.

Since then, Nadal has won 15 straight semis in a row.

“I changed a couple of things,” Nadal explained about the striking difference between the first set last night and everything that came af- terward. “I felt that I was not playing bad the first set but I was playing too much against his backhand. I feel he’s waiting for me there.

“At the beginning of the second, I knew that something had to change. Be more unpredicta­ble. Because without playing bad, I was losing. Something had to change.”

Del Potro could not adjust in return. He departed the court a dejected man but having made even more fans, for his grit and his charm.

Nadal, meanwhile, is back in the U.S. Open final for the first time since 2013.

As for the undercard semi Saturday, perhaps introducti­ons are in order.

On one side was Carreno Busta: third-best Spanish men’s tennis player, a 26-year-old who in 15 previous Grand Slam appearance­s only once got beyond the third round — at Roland Garros this year, where he edged Canada’s Milos Raonic in a marathon five-setter, then retired from his following match versus Rafael Nadal with an abdominal fracture.

On the other was Anderson: a 31year-old South African (nominally; an all-American at Illinois, he resides in Florida) who has advanced beyond the fourth round just once before, losing to Stan Wawrinka in the U.S. Open quarter-finals in 2015. He occasional­ly shadow-boxes after a good point, an entertaini­ng change from the customary tennis fist pump.

Anderson is almost alarmingly intense but susceptibl­e to twitchy meltdowns in the big moments. And there is no moment so big as Sunday, a title bout with Nadal.

“I’m just over the moon right now,” he said, after scrambling over flower pots to climb up into his box, a tradition usually reserved for a win in the final. “It was an unbelievab­ly tough match for me. I was pretty nervous. I really had to dig deep and I think my emotion at the end summed it up.”

Nine months ago, Anderson was told he might need hip surgery. Robust physiother­apy averted the knife. “This means the absolute world to me.”

He offered a shout-out of sorts to all the top seeds who fell or never made it to Queens because of injury, which opened up the draw. “Some of them gave us a bit of a shot to try and make a run at this tournament.”

Anderson didn’t face a seeded player until the quarters — he slotted in at No. 28 — where he eliminated the last U.S. man left standing, Sam Querrey, in a serve-pounding collision. The world No. 32 is the lowestrank­ed player in a Slam final since 2009, but he was tipped by some tennis insiders as a dark horse from the get-go.

And against Nadal, he is a serious underdog. His head-to-head record against the world No. 1: 0-4.

 ?? CLIVE BRUNSKILL/GETTY IMAGES ?? Rafael Nadal dropped the first set to Juan Martin del Potro, then rolled through the next nine games, eventually beating the Argentine in four sets. Nadal will face Kevin Anderson in the men’s final Sunday.
CLIVE BRUNSKILL/GETTY IMAGES Rafael Nadal dropped the first set to Juan Martin del Potro, then rolled through the next nine games, eventually beating the Argentine in four sets. Nadal will face Kevin Anderson in the men’s final Sunday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada