Can you learn to have good taste?
Preferences in art and decor aren’t entirely subjective and some say they can be taught
Taste presents an age-old quandary: it is notoriously hard to define. Discussions on the topic often fade into unhelpful aphorisms like “to each her own” or “live and let live.” After all, what is too much chintz to one person is comfortable and cosy to another. My favourite abstract painter may leave you cold or, in that proverbial art jab, look like the work of a toddler.
The subject becomes even more delicate as we discover that decor and art preferences aren’t entirely subjective. Sociologists tell us there’s a strong social component; notions of elegance have roots in class dynamics. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but it can also reveal socioeconomic status. Our homes reflect, at least, as much about our peers as ourselves.
Still, as Justice Potter Stewart said of pornography, most of us know poor taste when we see it. Intuitively, something just feels off. And researchers have nixed the idea that the more you’re exposed to an image, the more you like it, as might happen with a pop song. Bad art, it turns out, never really grows on you.
In a study published in 2013 in the Journal of Aesthetics, for example, participants rated Thomas Kinkade — whose mass-produced artwork graces many doctors’ offices — worse with repeated views, while appraisals of an admired, English pre-Raphaelite painter John Everett Millais remained constant. People didn’t rate the artist, whose works hang in Tate Britain any higher the more they saw him. Thus, for all its slipperiness, there seems to be some accounting for taste. But how does one cultivate esthetic judgment? Can you learn to spot beautiful things?
The art historian Maxwell L. Anderson fervently contends that you can. And, he says, it doesn’t require formal training or growing up in a refined environment, although that certainly might lay the groundwork. “Judging quality in art or design,” Anderson said, “is a skill that anybody can develop.”
Anderson, the president of the Souls Grown Deep Foundation, is the past director of several leading U.S. museums, including the Whitney, and his book, The Quality Instinct, teaches readers how to see objets d’art through a museum director’s eye. Anyone can divine Mark Rothko or Mark Bradford’s greatness; consistently assessing exceptional work before an artist achieves public recognition is the most rigorous test. For five years, Anderson did just that, presiding over the United States’ most influential survey of contemporary art: the Whitney Biennial. His experience, he said, can be applied to everyday life.
Good design enraptures Anderson, from his Sorrento cup and saucer, readily available on the internet, to Sarah Sze’s virtuosic sculptures, which have graced the U.S. Pavilion at the Venice Biennale. Both, he explained, display forceful imagination and technical skill. “So many glammed-up espresso cups are too thin-walled and thus chip or break easily, are hot to the touch, and don’t stack,” Anderson said.
“Americans in particular love hobbies,” he said. “And they can use those same visual impulses to develop an eye for art and design.” For instance, those who take joy in cooking have, most likely, already refined an instinct for quality culinary wares. They may not realize it: their beloved Le Creuset conforms to the same principles of superior craftsmanship as any of Anderson’s cherished possessions, such as the midcentury tackle box that belonged to his father. The trick is exercising this brain reflex to new stimuli.
Learning to see the quality instinct in other people’s space is also key to developing better judgment. Houses with strong esthetics may come in every shape and size, but they, too, hold several teachable lessons. Chief among them: Thou shalt not copy. Parroting a magazine or someone else’s home seldom achieves a result worth much retrospection.
As mixed media artist Bastienne Schmidt puts it, authenticity is crucial. Live who you are, she says; don’t conform to anybody’s design prescription.
To that end, Schmidt and her husband, the photographer Philippe Cheng, have an enchantingly modern Bridgehampton, N.Y., studio-cum-home, a prototype of which they drew for their architect, on a napkin, in 1998 — and where they raised their sons, Max, 18, and Julian, 15
Perhaps one of the most compelling aspects of the couple’s quality instinct is invisible: their patience. Tastemakers never rush to find accessories and fill walls. Today, the pair’s art hangs throughout; their Knoll and Paul McCobb furniture is gracefully mismatched. But it wasn’t always this way. The couple’s creative lifestyle can be deceptive, as each room collapses years of self-restraint into a single moment.
“These objects came into place very slowly,” said Schmidt, describing their design journey. “We didn’t have a lot of money when we moved in. We just had white walls, art, books and a kid’s table in the kitchen.”
In the experience of Noah Riley, an architect in Los Angeles, people too often equate quality with ideas of flawlessness. He’s known for residences that are California cool — as though Richard Neutra’s famous Case Study houses got a warm 21stcentury makeover. But too much of the same, Riley said, is boring. While every detail matters to him and his wife, Juliette Cohen, a writer, the couple isn’t afraid to range widely in their West Hollywood home.
And the result reflects their individual tastes — complementary, Riley explained, but not fully aligned. Both he and Cohen brought objects into their space that convey their personal esthetics, joint decision-making and history, in reminding them of their parents. Taken together, their approach is a studied blend of past and present, which manages to feel spare and full at once.