Toronto Star

Is Canada’s health-care system making wise choices?

- Adam Kassam is a resident physician in the department of physical medicine & rehabilita­tion at Western University. ADAM KASSAM

One of the most important campaigns in Canada has nothing to do with politics. Choosing Wisely Canada is an initiative that aims to curtail the unnecessar­y tests and treatments in our health care system.

Started in 2014 by a team from the University of Toronto, Canadian Medical Associatio­n and St. Michael’s Hospital, Choosing Wisely is part of a global movement that first began in the United States by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. It now spans 20 countries across five continents and includes the majority of medical societies and associatio­ns, including those in Canada.

The evidence to support a reduction in wasteful diagnostic and therapeuti­c resources is clear and uncontrove­rsial. The Canadian Institute for Health Informatio­n estimates that 30 per cent of health care, or nearly one million tests and treatments annually, is unnecessar­y.

This is a staggering figure, and especially worrisome given Canada’s growing health care expenditur­e, which totalled $228 billion — or 11 per cent of its gross domestic product — in 2016. A national effort to curb unnecessar­y testing and treatment not only makes medical sense, but is also economical­ly prudent in the context of ballooning health care utilizatio­n.

Choosing Wisely hopes to achieve its goals through grassroots advocacy by publishing a series of practice recommenda­tions for physicians based on internatio­nal peer-reviewed research.

Interestin­gly, many of the studies used to guide these recommenda­tions did not collect data or outcomes on minority population­s. In studies that did, most of the patients analyzed were Caucasian. It asks the question, is Canadian health care choosing wisely or merely choosing whitely?

This is why it matters. In the past, the medical community has experience­d the perils of ignoring large segments of the population in its research initiative­s.

For example, scientists have recently lamented that our general understand­ing of how disease affects women is extremely poor because most of the informatio­n previously collected was on middle-aged men.

Similarly, studies have shown that a patient’s race plays a significan­t role in disease screening, diagnosis and management. Unfortunat­ely, research on minority population­s has been scarce and eclipsed by studies that favour the inclusion of patients with high socioecono­mic status who are often Caucasian.

This research bias is hard to shake because research is notoriousl­y hard to conduct. It first involves identifyin­g a clinical question, generating a hypothesis, developing an experiment­al protocol and securing funding.

Subsequent­ly, researcher­s need to navigate the important but Byzantine institutio­nal review processes before addressing the challenges associated with subject recruitmen­t, data collection and analysis.

Ideal patients are those who have the luxury of time and who are able to travel to downtown research hospitals for repeated evaluation. It is easy to see how this is unlikely to include a minority single mother working multiple jobs in Scarboroug­h.

Canada’s minister of science, Kirsty Duncan, recently introduced the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan in order to address the chronic underrepre­sentation of women, First Nations, visible minorities and persons with disabiliti­es among Canada research chairs. This laudable effort should also dovetail with the minister’s insistence that taxpayerfu­nded medical research focus on all communitie­s represente­d in our country and not just select groups.

In an era that will be increasing­ly dominated by big data genomics, artificial intelligen­ce and personaliz­ed medicine, our society will migrate away from a one size fits all health care paradigm.

Choosing Wisely will continue being an essential and vital initiative in helping to reduce unnecessar­y tests and streamline medical care in this country.

Future iterations of its recommenda­tions, along with any practice guidelines created, should endeavour to more comprehens­ively apply to and represent the great diversity of Canada.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada