Housing bill garners scorn from advocates
Province’s inclusionary zoning regulations will hinder, not help, affordability, group says
A homeless shelter is the first place Fazanah Khair Mohammad, her husband and five children lived when they arrived in Canada from Tajikistan.
She said she was unable to find an affordable home in Toronto’s tight rental market until about a month later, when a friend helped the family of seven secure a two-bedroom apartment in East York for $1,200 a month. The cramped quarters were supposed to be temporary, said Khair Mohammad, 36. But that was two years ago.
“My kids fight over the washroom. We only have one,” she said. But every three-bedroom apartment she’s viewed in the last six months is “very expensive,” at least $1,900 a month, and in “very bad condition.”
Khair Mohammad, who said her family is now on a seven-year waiting list for affordable housing, joined ACORN Canada, an advocacy group for low-income families. She and a couple of dozen other demonstrators protested the provincial government’s proposed inclusionary zoning regulations Tuesday outside Minister of Housing Peter Milczyn’s office on Bay St.
Inclusionary zoning would allow municipalities to force developers to create affordable housing units. However, many city councillors and housing advocates say if the province keeps its draft legislation as is, it will miss an opportunity to add thousands of affordable housing units in Toronto.
“This gets a failing grade as far as legislation is concerned,” said Councillor Paula Fletcher (Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth). “Back to the drawing board, please.”
Social Planning Toronto, a charity focused on social justice, equity and quality of life, released a new report this week comparing what Ontario is proposing to what hundreds of U.S. jurisdictions already have in place.
“As currently framed, Ontario’s (inclusionary zoning) regulations do not promote the creation of rental and deeply affordable units; in fact, they inhibit it,” the report says.
Under the draft legislation, cities such as Toronto would be required to either exempt developers from funding community benefits or pay developers 40 per cent of the cost of the affordable units.
But the Social Planning Toronto report suggests many U.S. inclusionary zoning programs do not aim to compensate developers for affordable housing. Instead, municipalities most commonly offer density bonuses, which results in not only more units, but more affordable units, the report says.
Ontario is proposing that developers would have to temporarily make 5 to10 per cent of their building units affordable, but only if the building is a condominium, not purpose-built rentals, according to the proposed legislation.
The units would remain affordable for at least 20 years and up to 30 years.
Most U.S. programs require more than 10 per cent, and as much as 20 per cent, of a development’s units to be affordable, the report says. Many programs focus on rental housing, rather than homeownership, to ensure the units are affordable to low-income residents.
The report also says 80 per cent of U.S. jurisdictions require units remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years, if not forever.
Toronto is in a housing crisis and the province needs to come up with stronger inclusionary zoning regulations, said Acorn’s Alejandra Ruiz Vargas.
“People need to be vocal, express their feelings and concerns. We are not happy with it, and we need to change it,” Ruiz said.
The province is accepting comments until Feb. 1.
Council will vote at its meeting next week on whether to submit comments.