Toronto Star

Predicting the timing of industry disruption­s

Fewer people will own cars in the future, observers agree, but the question is when

- SPECIAL TO THE STAR

In one way or another, all industries deal with some form of disruption. Recently, many cases of disruption have occurred in the digital/technologi­cal space, and the auto industry is receiving a double dose of both.

The automotive business model is continuall­y changing; there’s not one single automaker that hasn’t had to readjust its plans and explore alternativ­es, seek out a new sustainabl­e competitiv­e advantage, align with software or service partners to boost connectivi­ty and, in some instances, alter what mobility will look like in the future.

Industry experts can make prognostic­ations, but no one has a complete picture of what the auto industry will look like in five, 10 or 20 years’ time. The only certainty is that digital and technologi­cal advancemen­ts will play a large role in what’s to come.

In a 2016 report, McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm, predicted that vehicle ownership will soon become a smaller piece of the transporta­tion pie. That perspectiv­e has been echoed by many automakers, including Ford Motor Company.

“We are at an inflection point, and mobility is the natural extension of our business model,” explains Raj Nair, executive vice-president, product developmen­t at Ford Motor Company.

So, what has brought the auto industry to this inflection point?

There are many contributi­ng factors, but the main disruption­s have come from ride-sharing programs and the advancemen­ts in fully autonomous driving. Ride-sharing The term ride-sharing or car-sharing is everywhere in automotive lingo and potentiall­y the biggest disrupter to the current automotive purchasing model. The former currently exists with companies such as Uber and Lyft, while the latter utilizes companies such as ZipCar and car2go, and those programs are expected to expand with further automaker integratio­n.

The ascension of companies such as Uber comes down to convenienc­e and cost, especially in heavy-traffic cities. People are choosing these modes of transporta­tion not only to eliminate the stress of stop-and-go traffic and finding a parking space, but also to be more productive with their time.

According to a survey by ReportLink­er, millennial­s are key to the rise of these car-sharing programs, with 70 per cent opting for that service when going out for an evening. In addition, 91 per cent of older genera- tions own vehicles, but that percentage is reduced to 78 for millennial­s.

Trends come and go, but the question remains whether ride-sharing services are enough to displace the ownership of a vehicle. It certainly makes sense to use one under circumstan­ces when alcohol may play a factor, but the costs will add up when you work in errands throughout the day. That’s where car-sharing programs come in, and a combinatio­n of both might simply do the trick.

The world isn’t ready yet for autonomous driving, evidenced by Volvo’s slowdown on its ‘Drive Me’ program planned in Sweden

Autonomous driving Another disrupter going hand-inhand with ride-sharing programs are fully autonomous vehicles.

The world isn’t ready yet for autonomous driving, evidenced by Volvo’s slowdown on its “Drive Me” program planned in Sweden.

It was supposed to begin in late 2017 as Volvo pushed to be the first traditiona­l automaker to showcase a significan­t autonomous program, but it is pushing until 2021its plan to deliver 100 self-driving cars to 100 Swedish people.

Autonomous driving may not be ready for the regular day-to-day world, but that’s not impeding automakers and cities from working to- gether to test future plans on private grounds. According to Bloomberg Philanthro­pies and the Aspen Institute, 47 cities around the globe are testing or have committed to autonomous pilot programs with 38 of them beginning projects within 2017.

Developing the technology hasn’t been the problem with an abundance of semi-autonomous aids already in existence. The concern comes down to safety and regulation­s — an area clouded in mystery. Who would be at fault in a car accident: the driver or the automaker?

“It’s not just vehicle-to-vehicle communicat­ion that has to exist, but vehicle-to-infrastruc­ture communicat­ion that needs a lot of attention, and this is currently being restricted by national and provincial legislatio­n,” explains Barrie Kirk, executive director of the Canadian Automated Vehicles Centre of Excellence.

“Nobody is going to flick a light switch for fully autonomous cars to launch,” Kirk says. “It will be a gradual rollout with low-speed electric autonomous taxis coming out first in urban/downtown areas, and by middecade we will start to see a business or personal extension of that.”

The billions of research and developmen­t dollars being spent on advancemen­ts in autonomous technology are at a frenzied pace. At this rate, fully autonomous vehicles could be ready and functional by 2020 or 2021, but more likely will be held back from being the next big mobility service due to city and infrastruc­ture challenges.

Once those are addressed, the auto industry will face a world of disruption to its existing model with automakers pushing out less vehicles and placing more emphasis on technology and connectivi­ty.

 ?? MERCEDES ?? Fully autonomous vehicles could be ready and functional by 2020 or 2021, but they’ll likely be held back by city and infrastruc­ture challenges.
MERCEDES Fully autonomous vehicles could be ready and functional by 2020 or 2021, but they’ll likely be held back by city and infrastruc­ture challenges.
 ?? GENERAL MOTORS ?? For autonomous driving to work, both vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastruc­ture communicat­ion must exist.
GENERAL MOTORS For autonomous driving to work, both vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastruc­ture communicat­ion must exist.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada