Toronto Star

PWU President Mel Hyatt on clean energy and more

- BY MEL HYATT President Power Workers’ Union

The federal government recently released the results of a June 2017 public survey on energy and resource developmen­t. Results suggest that public support for nuclear energy still occupies the basement at 45% compared with solar and hydro, with numbers more than double that of nuclear. Wind is next at 86%, followed by oil at 63%. The same survey showed about one third of the people surveyed support making greenhouse gas reductions a guiding principle for natural resource developmen­t. Other principles include keeping energy affordable at 25%, ensuring safe production and transporta­tion at 20%, and creating more energy jobs at 10%. The facts suggest Canada’s nuclear technology meets these principles. On a lifecycle basis, nuclear generated electricit­y emissions are slightly more than hydro and wind but less than solar. Intermitte­nt wind and solar generation require back up about seventy percent of the time. In Ontario, this backup generation is typically provided by carbon emitting natural gas plants. By comparison, nuclear plants produce “baseload”, low-carbon electricit­y twenty-four seven. Over the last 30 years, Canada’s reactor technology and uranium exports have helped avoid about one billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO ) globally. Ontario’s nuclear fleet helps avoid about 45 million tonnes of CO annually, the equivalent of taking ten million combustion engine vehicles off the road.With next year’s $20/ tonne federal carbon tax, this represents a value of $900,000,000 to Ontarians. The province’s reactors also help Quebec maximize its low-carbon hydropower production and electricit­y exports. In the future, climate change impacts on electricit­y production will make this nuclear/ hydropower relationsh­ip more important. Ontario became a leader developing Canada’s nuclear technology partly because the province doesn’t have vast hydropower resources like Quebec and Manitoba. CANDU nuclear reactors are the electricit­y workhorses in Ontario, meeting about 60% of the province’s electricit­y needs. In New Brunswick, for similar reasons, nuclear provides a third of its electricit­y. Analyses show that nuclear power is today’s best low-cost power source and will continue to be in the future. The current average per kw/h cost of nuclear in Ontario is 6.6 cents compared to solar at 48.1 cents and wind at 13.3 cents. Nonetheles­s, advocates of wind, solar and emerging distribute­d energy technologi­es (DER e.g., battery storage and microgrids) call for increased investment­s citing environmen­tal benefits, customer choice and declining costs. The costs of nuclear are well known but the same cannot be said for solar, wind and DER. Ontario Power Generation’s nuclear fleet is regulated by the Ontario Energy Board—the only generator subject to such oversight in the province. The regulatory framework, including the process to be followed for analyzing DER costs and benefits, is yet to be determined. To date, most of Ontario’s DER investment­s have been demonstrat­ion projects paid for largely by electricit­y consumers. DER technologi­es make consumers producers of electricit­y or “prosumers”. The resulting two-way flows of electricit­y generate massive amounts of data that must be managed to ensure reliabilit­y. This requires significan­t expenditur­es on informatio­n technology. And unlike nuclear, the decommissi­oning and waste management costs for DER have not been addressed. Solar panels and batteries contain toxic chemicals that must be managed. While DER may facilitate Integrated Regional Resource Planning to the benefit of local consumers and economies, it will create a range of electricit­y rates across Ontario.The bottom line – Ontarians will not know DER’s impacts on electricit­y rates for some time. Canada’s nuclear technology has been safely and reliably operating for decades. The economy benefits from a five billion dollar a year, 50,000 plus job industry. Making nuclear the baseload foundation for Canada’s low-carbon energy future means even more environmen­tal and economic benefits, including: low-carbon electricit­y exports; electrific­ation of the economy; powering zero emission vehicles; hydrogen production; and, cancer-fighting, productivi­ty improving, space exploring innovation­s. Canada’s nuclear technology is our “ace” in the hole.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada