CEO promises more ethical VW
Despite fines, penalties, firm has 24 billion euros in cash with record sales
Volkswagen’s new CEO, Herbert Diess, has vowed to build a more ethical culture after the company’s diesel emissions scandal and outlined a new structure aimed at streamlining decision-making at the sprawling company.
Diess said Thursday at the shareholder meeting that the company’s six divisions would make their own decisions and without always getting approval from the top.
He said that while cases of unethical conduct can happen anywhere, “we definitely had too many of them.” He said achieving a stronger ethics culture was a core business goal, “just as are vehicle development and marketing.”
Diess was addressing his first shareholder meeting since taking over as CEO from Matthias Mueller on April 12. He praised Mueller’s contributions to moving the company past the scandal and said he took over with the company in “robust condition.”
Despite heavy outlays for fines and penalties, the company has 24 billion euros ($36.9 billion) in net cash and achieved record sales of 10.74 million vehicles last year.
“Two years ago, no one would have believed it, perhaps even we would not have,” Diess said.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found in 2015 that Volkswagen manipulated software so that diesel emissions controls worked only when cars were on test stands.
Otherwise they continued to emit harmful nitrogen oxide in excess of legal limits. The company was also widely criticized for conducting experiments in which monkeys were exposed to diesel fumes in an unsuccessful attempt to prove the diesel technology was safe.
Board chair Hans Dieter Poetsch condemned the monkey experiments in his speech. He said they were under investigation and “in no way comprehensible.”
He told the shareholder meeting that the company still faces several legal issues from the diesel scandal and that the company “cannot draw the line under it” yet. Those include a shareholder lawsuit before a court in the German town of Braunschweig that alleges company officials were too slow in disclosing the scandal, depriving investors of information they needed to make decisions about their holdings.