Toronto Star

‘No Exit’ to the trade war?

- CHRISTOPHE­R SANDS Christophe­r Sands is senior research professor and director of the Center for Canadian Studies at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced Internatio­nal Studies in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter: @sandsathop­kins

In French Existentia­list Jean-Paul Sartre’s book No Exit the philosophe­r’s punchline is, “Hell is other people.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is not as well read in philosophy as his father was, but after the G7 Summit in Charlevoix, Que., this weekend, he can almost certainly relate.

U.S. President Donald Trump came to Quebec spoiling for a fight. The previous week, he announced that the temporary exemptions from punitive steel and aluminum tariffs that he had given to Canada, the countries of the European Union, Japan and Mexico would not be renewed. Trump had also launched a process to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all vehicles imported into the United States.

Meanwhile, the renegotiat­ion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has not been going well. Trump refused a call from Trudeau unless Trudeau first agreed to the U.S. demand for a five-year sunset clause in a new NAFTA agreement. Had Trudeau agreed, that might have been the most expensive call in Canadian history.

Trump’s anger with Trudeau has been building for some time. In February, Trump complained that Canada was “very smooth” on trade.

This wasn’t a compliment. Trump prides himself on his ability to read the public mood. Canada’s unpreceden­ted, evidence-based outreach to U.S. leaders and businesses was showing Canada could do the same.

Then last month, Trump vented that Canada was “very spoiled” and “very difficult” on trade.

Then last week, Trudeau appeared on NBC’s Sunday public affairs program Meet the Press with Chuck Todd. Trudeau called Trump’s use of section 232 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1962 to impose steel, aluminum and even automotive tariffs on Canada under the justificat­ion that they were necessary for U.S. national security, “insulting and unacceptab­le.”

If Trump didn’t appreciate this push back from Trudeau on a domestic U.S. broadcast popular with establishm­ent Republican­s and Democrats, he has only himself to blame.

Trudeau and his team made a conscious decision to impose message discipline on the Liberal caucus and maintain a firm but friendly approach to the United States. Personal relationsh­ips were cultivated within the Trump White House, with Trudeau himself working on a personal rapport with the president.

After the first 500 days what has Trudeau got to show for his persistent outreach to Trump? Canadians are paying softwood tariffs, paying the price of NAFTA uncertaint­y with no end in sight, and now being threatened with even more tariffs. This explains why Trudeau and his government have been pushing back against Trump’s accusation­s and criticisms of Canada.

Trump has noticed the change in tone from Canada and reacted with hostility. But for once Trump’s sense of timing may be off: it may now be too late for escalating threats to force Trudeau to retreat, or to answer Trump’s bluster with Canadian niceness.

The reason it may be too late is the election of Doug Ford as Ontario’s pre- mier. The federal Conservati­ves, led by Andrew Scheer, are the most probable alternativ­e the Trudeau and the Liberals for voters in the federal election scheduled for October 2019. Scheer is the epitome of Canadian niceness, and federal Conservati­ve MPs have refrained from tough attacks on Trudeau over NAFTA and foreign policy toward the United States.

Ford is now positioned to become the Conservati­ves’ attack dog on Trudeau policies on a range of economic issues, from NAFTA renegotiat­ion to the carbon tax. And as leader of Canada’s largest province, his criticisms will reverberat­e across the country and, should he choose to challenge Trudeau for risking the future of the Canadian auto industry in his fight with Trump, the critique will hurt.

Trudeau can no longer back down to Trump’s bullying, even if he was inclined to do so. As a result, Trump’s ill-timed personaliz­ation of trade disputes with Canada and his staffers’ personal name calling in recent days will not work, if they ever might have.

This is the reason that Canada-U. S. relations are in the worst shape in my lifetime. Trump and Trudeau are locked in a bitter conflict and neither side is showing much flexibilit­y. Instead they seem ready to give one another Hell.

 ?? EVAN VUCCI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Trade talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the G7 summit became heated.
EVAN VUCCI/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Trade talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the G7 summit became heated.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada