Toronto Star

Are phones altering parental instincts?

Technology may be interferin­g with the way parents and children are interactin­g

- HEIDI STEVENS

Erika Christakis has written a beautiful, troubling essay for the Atlantic that I hope every parent reads.

“The Dangers of Distracted Parenting” sounds an alarm about the gradual decrease in the quality, if not the quantity, of the time we spend with our children, thanks to our godforsake­n phones.

On average, we spend more time with our kids than just about any parents in history, research shows, but far too much of that time is choppy and emotionall­y unpredicta­ble — “governed” Christakis writes, “by the beeps and enticement­s of smartphone­s.”

“We seem to have stumbled into the worst model of parenting imaginable — always present physically, thereby blocking children’s autonomy,” she writes, “yet only fitfully present emotionall­y.”

We’ve built our lives, Christakis notes, around the premise that we can always be on.

“Always working, always parenting, always available to their spouse and their own parents and anyone else who might need them, while also staying on top of the news, while also rememberin­g, on the walk to the car, to order more toilet paper from Amazon.”

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Tell us something we don’t know.

Here’s something we don’t know: The subtle, but harmful, ways our tech habits may be changing the way parents and children — indeed, humans — have interacted since the beginning of time.

“The new parental-interactio­n style can interrupt an ancient emotional cueing system, whose hallmark is respon- sive communicat­ion, the basis of most human learning,” Christakis writes. “We’re in uncharted territory.” Child-developmen­t experts, she writes, have different names for the adult/child signalling system that builds the basic architectu­re of the brain: “serve and return,” “a conversati­onal duet.”

“A problem therefore arises when the emotionall­y resonant adult-child cueing system so essential to early learning is interrupte­d — by a text, for example, or a quick check-in on Instagram,” she writes.

She quotes psychologi­st Kathy HirshPasek: “Toddlers cannot learn when we break the flow of conversati­ons by picking up our cellphones or looking at the text that whizzes by our screens.”

This is an alarm that I think we hear vaguely, constantly, in the background. There’s always some signal that we’re failing to build or honour reasonable tech boundaries for ourselves: the latest article, that parent glued to Instagram during the spring musical, the nagging voice in our head that reminds us of all the times we’ve been that parent.

“My own adult children like to joke that they wouldn’t have survived infancy if I’d had a smartphone in my clutches 25 years ago,” Christakis notes.

But her article mulls the consequenc­es in a way that’s so plainly, frankly heartbreak­ing, that I think it demands attention.

“Smartphone use has been associated with a familiar sign of addiction,” Christakis writes. “Distracted adults grow irritable when their phone use is interrupte­d; they not only miss emotional cues but actually misread them. A tuned-out parent may be quicker to anger than an engaged one, assuming that a child is trying to be manipulati­ve when, in reality, she just wants attention.”

Which isn’t to say we’re never allowed to look away from our kids.

“Short, deliberate separation­s can of course be harmless,” she writes, “even healthy, for parent and child alike.”

Not to mention necessary. Parents have to get stuff done.

In generation­s past, that meant children were left to play alone in playpens or, in the case of 19th-century frontier parents, Christakis notes, on the open doors of ovens.

(She cites an anecdote from Little House on the Prairie author Laura In- galls Wilder, who recalls looking up from her chores one day to see a pair of riding ponies leaping over her toddler daughter’s head.)

“But that sort of separation,” Christakis writes, “is different from the inattentio­n that occurs when a parent is with a child but communicat­ing through his or her non-engagement that the child is less valuable than an email.”

Food for thought, as we embark on the next few months of school-free, homework-free — but not distractio­n-free — months of summer.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? With phones in the picture, parenting has become more physically present, “yet only fitfully present emotionall­y,” Erika Christakis writes in the Atlantic.
DREAMSTIME With phones in the picture, parenting has become more physically present, “yet only fitfully present emotionall­y,” Erika Christakis writes in the Atlantic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada