Toronto Star

Being a real friend to those in need

- Kate Carraway Twitter: @KateCarraw­ay

When mental health landed in the recent news cycle of the bad, the worse and the absolutely inexplicab­le — the pace and volume of all of this constant shock means it could have been last week, it could have been 1,000 years ago, there’s really no way to know — it was accompanie­d by a call to arms, to check in on friends who might be dealing with something, to let them know that someone has their back.

This, alone, was hopeful. It was love, pure and useful, in an era defined mostly by constant shock, when every day seems to bring new traumas and tragedies, to decide (insofar as millions of social-media accounts can decide) that we’re going to have eyes on each other, and are going to agree that it’s not, it’s just not, OK to squirm away from someone’s basic humanity because it’s awkward, embarrassi­ng or uncomforta­ble.

A day or two later, the conversati­on — or, the booming, massive formlessne­ss that passes for conversati­on — shifted, somewhat obliquely, toward how much of this “help” is contingent on trust, on friendship­s where vulnerabil­ity is shared and required and ongoing. Someone who is drifting or suffering or disappeari­ng — which is sometimes obvious and urgent and linear, and sometimes not — is more likely to accept the help being offered by someone they’re already deep in it than someone more tangential, who senses something is up and drops a text. (I mean, do both.)

If ever there was a time for a sub-movement of tenderness, it’s now — nothing is more evident than the fact that we, to get Pinterest-y about it, “belong to each other.” The work and rules of friendship rarely make their way to a social-media moment, in part (or in total?) because friendship is the relationsh­ip we think about, and definitely talk about, the least. It’s supposed to just exist, unattended to, even though friend breakups are — anecdotall­y, but obviously — just as painful as romantic breakups, and even though the divorce rate is still trucking, and even though loneliness is an epidemic.

Friendship isn’t bound by blood or law; there are few ceremonial ways to mark it, to mean it. (One good idea I’ve heard is an annual “friendiver­sary pie.”) When school ends and we’re without the people we were thrust toward by virtue of circumstan­ce and geography —“proximity” being a key indicator of who you’re going to be friends with — and have to (and get to) start choosing who we want to belong to, especially after turning 30, time starts to dissolve until a month becomes a handful of days you can’t really remember (like, did June actually happen?). I would not have guessed, before, that the people who shook out of my 20s would be the girl I met at a summer class — Faulkner, I think? — the girl I met at a temp job, the girl I met at a weird TIFF party I went to alone. True friendship is, inherently, random, but — or, because of that — it demands some of the most careful work.

Where this conversati­on about a new paradigm, or at least the potential for one, hasn’t gained any ground (yet) is the extent to which that principle of care, courage and vulnerabil­ity also applies when a friend is doing some dirt, from stepping out on their spouse to supporting political policies that don’t reflect their values. There are different kinds of holes to be down. Calling this out takes more of that courage, and vulnerabil­ity, than asking someone if they need you to help them make a doctor’s appointmen­t, or do the laundry. It’s stickier with judgment, even more open to rejection, like passing a black light over the details of the friendship.

I sometimes wonder why my friends didn’t refuse to have brunch with me when all I was bringing to the table were stories about that one guy, where nothing changed, not the relationsh­ip or my insights about it or my interest in talking about it until the restaurant closed. They would have stepped in if I was super-depressed, in bed, but no one told me I was being stupid. They should have.

We have obligation­s to our people, to be courageous enough to show up, and vulnerable enough to make it matter.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? If ever there was a time for a sub-movement of tenderness, it’s now, Kate Carraway writes. Friendship is the relationsh­ip we think about, and definitely talk about, the least.
DREAMSTIME If ever there was a time for a sub-movement of tenderness, it’s now, Kate Carraway writes. Friendship is the relationsh­ip we think about, and definitely talk about, the least.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada