Toronto Star

Changes coming for ‘big box’ child care

- STAFF REPORTERS

LAURIE MONSEBRAAT­EN AND KRISTIN RUSHOWY The Ontario government has changed the rules to give profitmaki­ng, “big box” daycare operators more access to public funds, raising concerns among advocates that quality will suffer.

NDP child care critic Doly Begum raised the issue in the legislatur­e on Wednesday, saying studies show non-profit daycare “offers higher standards of care and better wages for workers. This is why child-care advocates have urged the province to expand not-for-profit, child-care spaces.

“We know the biggest issue in the child-care sector is the lack of affordable, high-quality, safe child-care spaces,” the Scarboroug­h Southwest MPP said.

“By removing the for-profit threshold, this government is opening the doors to largechain providers.”

Begum also said the government’s move to cut $23 million in subsidies for low-income families is “making child care less affordable for those who need it.”

The previous Liberal government had planned to spend more than $3.5 billion over five years to create 100,000 new spots in licensed child care. At that time, advocates successful­ly lobbied for rules that would limit the amount of funds available to for-profit daycares — including those run by so-called “big-box” child-care businesses.

But in August, the new Progressiv­e Conservati­ve govern- ment quietly removed that cap, known as the “for-profit threshold.”

Decades of research has found that non-profit or public child care is typically of higher quality than corporate-run centres — largely because the focus on profits impacts levels of care, staffing and standards.

Currently, about one-quarter of licenced child-care spots in Ontario are in the for-profit sector. On Wednesday, Education Minister Lisa Thompson said the government has been “listening to parents and working with groups across Ontario and, in our mandate, we wanted to be fair to parents across Ontario and give them more choice.”

With regard to corporate-run child-care, she said “we have every confidence in people who are caring for our children and the reality check is this is in response to all of Ontario … The nanny state of the previous administra­tion was proven not to work. We’re listening to parents across Ontario.”

But Carolyn Ferns, with the Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care, warned the removal of the for-profit threshold is a sign the Ford government is “just throwing up its hands and letting the market rip.”

“It’s a very risky decision,” she said in an interview. “We know there are big corporate players that want to open and expand in Ontario. And they don’t expand in a way that meets parents’ needs best, they do it in a way that is most profitable for them. “So that little rural area that doesn’t have child care — that’s not where they want to open.”

As far as addressing parent choice, Ferns noted the province just completed a major consultati­on on child care with town halls across Ontario.

“The threshold was one of the things that was put in place to address concerns about protecting the province from big corporate players and if (the government) is going to reverse course without a public consultati­on, that’s a big deal,” she said.

The for-profit threshold didn’t discrimina­te against existing so-called “mom and pop” daycares, Ferns noted.

“This is about how we are going to grow a good system for Ontarians. And prioritizi­ng public and non-profit was a good way to go,” she said.

During the election campaign, Doug Ford said a Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government would create a tax credit to cover up to 75 per cent of parents’ child-care costs, up to a $6,750 per child maximum. That has yet to happen.

 ?? ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE TORONTO STAR ??
ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE TORONTO STAR

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada