Toronto Star

It’s 2005 all over again as Ford eyes junk rating

Automaker plans to fight back by focusing on higher-margin products Ford is rated just one step above junk by Moody’s Investors Service.

- MOLLY SMITH

Ford Motor Co. could be close to getting junked again.

That’s what the bond market is saying. The company’s debt is trading like it’s speculativ­e grade, as investors worry about how higher steel tariffs and slowing sales will weigh on its profits. Ford is rated one step above junk by Moody’s Investors Service and two steps by S&P Global Ratings.

Any downgrade could be painful for bond investors, and for the company. The automaker has more than $150 billion (U.S.) of short- and long-term debt globally, and is one of the15 biggest corporate bond issuers in the U.S. outside the financial sector.

Hedge funds turned in their worst monthly performanc­e in nearly three years in the first part of 2005, when Ford was cut to junk along with General Motors Co.

Bob Shanks, Ford’s chief financial officer, said on an earnings call last month that the company is committed to maintainin­g its investment­grade ratings, and doesn’t intend to lose that status again. The company is “moving with a sense of urgency and taking proactive steps to redesign and restructur­e the business,” and over time “the market will recognize our progress,” spokesman Brad Carroll said.

But debt investors are skeptical. The extra yield that money managers get for holding Ford’s 4.346 per cent bonds due 2026 rather than similar Treasuries jumped to levels typical of high- yield companies. The cost of protecting Ford’s debt against default using credit derivative­s rose in October to the highest levels since 2012 before settling down again. Moody’s downgraded the company in August to one level above junk, and said further cuts are possible in the medium term.

Ford fared better during the financial crisis than GM and the automaker now known as Fiat Chrysler Automobile­s NV, avoiding bankruptcy and the government-backed bailouts that its competitor­s received. But losing its investment-grade status forced Ford to finance itself on a secured basis, essentiall­y putting everything from its inventory to the rights to its oval blue logo in hock.

When Ford reclaimed its investment-grade ratings in 2012, after it cut debt and profits jumped, chairman Bill Ford announced the upgrade to employees on the public-address system normally used for fire drills in Ford’s Dearborn, Mich., headquarte­rs.

“When we pledged the blue oval it was enormously emotional for me personally and for my family, because we weren’t just pledging an asset, we were pledging our heritage,” Ford said in May 2012. “To get that back feels wonderful and this is one of the best days I can remember.”

Now the company is facing difficulty again. Ford told investors in July it is launching an up to five-year overhaul that could cost $11 billion, as it focuses on higher margin products like trucks and sport-utility vehi- cles and exits businesses including its U.S. sedans. However, it has provided scant details on the restructur­ing plan, and has yet to reschedule an investor meeting that was originally set for September.

Struggling operations in Asia and Europe prompted Ford to cut its 2018 profit forecast. The company posted about a 50 per cent decline in earnings for the second quarter, followed by a nearly 40 per cent decline in the third quarter.

Its shares last month fell to their lowest level since 2009. Ford’s bonds trade at risk premiums similar to those of junkrated companies in the auto industry, such as Allison Transmissi­on Holdings Inc. and Dana Inc., and have since Moody’s cut the company to a step above junk in late August, according to Bloomberg Intelligen­ce research.

The bonds have rallied recently, but still trade at risk premiums higher than Fiat Chrysler, which is rated junk, and GM, signalling investors believe Ford is a bigger credit risk.

One source of support as the company tries to fix itself is its cash position: Ford had around $35 billion of liquidity as of Sept. 30. That’s given comfort to credit raters, who have noted it as a positive. Earnings margins and operationa­l challenges outside the U.S. are top concerns to Moody’s, which rates Ford Baa3. S&P and Fitch Ratings both rate the company one step higher at BBB.

Ford would need to be cut to high yield by two ratings firms before it fell out of the investment-grade index. Many money managers don’t see that as likely, even if Moody’s decides to cut the company to speculativ­e-grade, said Joel Levington, a former S&P director and now head of credit research for Bloomberg Intelligen­ce.

Ford has options for avoiding downgrades, Levington said, including cutting its dividend — a step the company has insisted it won’t take — or selling less profitable units.

But bond analysts caution that the debt is by no means a slamdunk investment. Carmakers are cyclical businesses, and as the Federal Reserve raises rates, increasing financing costs for consumers, vehicle sales aren’t likely to improve much, if at all, from here.

“Autos were always the light that everyone’s looked to in this post-recession era,” said Jody Lurie, a corporate credit analyst at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC.

“I don’t think investors are looking at them on that momentum story that they once had, or looking at them as the beacon of hope that they once were.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada