Toronto Star

As climate warnings loom, poultry plant is last thing we need

- JESSICA SCOTT-REID OPINION Jessica Scott-Reid is a Canadian freelance writer and animal advocate.

While much of America reels from recent news regarding potentiall­y catastroph­ic effects of climate change in the White House-commission­ed National Climate Assessment (NCA), Canadians are instead learning of a new $660-million poultry processing plant opening in Ontario.

With research continuing to point to meat production as a clear contributo­r to climate change, news of the Maple Leaf Foods facility has many in the environmen­tal and animal rights communitie­s scratching their heads.

In reaction to the landmark NCA report, Harvard Law’s Dr. Helen Harwatt, a farmed animal law and policy fellow, advised that “getting protein from plant sources instead of animal sources would drasticall­y help in meeting climate targets and reduce the risk of overshoot- ing temperatur­e goals.”

This recommenda­tion is not new. Last month, the widely publicized UN Intergover­nmental Panel on Climate Change report, and subsequent research in the journal Nature, called on Western countries to reduce poultry and dairy consumptio­n by 60 per cent, and beef and pork by 90 per cent, in order to help avoid serious climate breakdown.

And yet, Canada is investing tens of millions into producing even more meat.

The federal and Ontario government­s are providing subsidies for the facility — $28 million and $34.5 million, respective­ly — taking a very contradict­ory position to government­al climate goals, which seek to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 to 30 per cent below 2005 levels (although the UN states that target should be 50 per cent by 2020).

And Maple Leaf Foods, by boasting of its goal to become a “zero waste to landfill facility,” appears to hope the public might forget that global animal agricultur­e produces more greenhouse gas emissions than all forms of transporta­tion combined and is a leading contributo­r to freshwater pollution, ocean destructio­n, deforestat­ion and biodiversi­ty loss.

Equally confusing is how the optics of this massive, government­backed meat processor contradict with messaging of the forthcomin­g Canada Food Guide, which, as has been widely reported, will emphasize sustainabl­e eating, specifical­ly recommendi­ng Canadians eat more plant-based proteins.

There are also concerns regarding animal welfare. Though Maple Leaf Foods appears proud of their future plant’s advanced technology and greater efficiency, this does not equal better treatment of ani- mals. In fact, the more industrial­ized, faster moving and further removed from humans the slaughter process becomes, the more animals tend to suffer.

The issue of longer transport times is also worrisome, as three older slaughterh­ouses are set to close in order to consolidat­e into the new plant. Canada is already known for having some of the worst farmed animal transport standards in the Western world, including allowing chickens to be transporte­d for up to 36 hours straight, and no laws regarding travel in extreme temperatur­es.

As issues of climate change, food sustainabi­lity and animal welfare continue to cause concern among a growing number of Canadians, it appears obvious that a multimilli­on-dollar meat processing plant is the last thing our country needs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada