Toronto Star

Province considers creation of health-care ‘super agency’

Proposal would scrap local health networks as part of massive transforma­tion, sources say

- THERESA BOYLE ROBERT BENZIE AND ROB FERGUSON HEALTH REPORTER QUEEN’S PARK BUREAU

CHRISTINE ELLIOTT

The provincial government is considerin­g a plan to shutter more than 20 health agencies — including Cancer Care Ontario, 14 local health integratio­n networks (LHINS) and e Health Ontario — and fold them into one “super agency,” the Star has learned.

Provincial bureaucrat­s have been asked to create a blueprint for a massive transforma­tion of the health system, according to numerous sources in the broader public sector. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they have not been authorized to give media interviews.

Describing the plan as a work in progress and subject to change, they said the intent is to keep front-line and core services intact, but to run them out of one agency under a single board of directors and a streamline­d layer of management.

The provincial cabinet met Thursday, but it is unclear whether it has signed off on the plan. Following the three-and-ahalf-hour cabinet meeting, Health Minister Christine Elliott did not deny the government is looking at getting rid of LHINs.

“All I can tell you is that we are looking at truly creating a patientcen­tred system of health care.” HEALTH MINISTER

“We’ve talked from the very beginning about doing a review of all agencies in government, so there’s nothing new here,” she said, referring to a health agency review announced shortly after last June’s election. “We’re continuing our review and working to create a patient-centred system of health care.”

Asked if the government would get rid of Cancer Care Ontario by absorbing it into a new super agency, Elliott said: “All I can tell you is that we are looking at truly creating a patient-centred system of health care — it’s the patient experience that is truly important.”

The Star has obtained a copy of an undated Ministry of Health document marked “confidenti­al” and labelled “explorator­y model,” which appears to point to the option of a large “provincial clinical and delivery agency” with a government-appointed board of directors, a chief executive and leadership team.

They would oversee three divisions, with one in charge of measuring health system performanc­e and including public health, a second division providing clinical oversight for cancer, organ donation, diabetes, critical care, mental health and chronic kidney disease, among others, and a back-office support division to handle procuremen­t, digital health and human resources.

Below these high-level functions would be 60 to 70 “integrated delivery systems” across the province, which could care for defined patient population­s by disease or geographic­al areas with a “comprehens­ive continuum of care” for common conditions like diabetes or mental health.

There are few details in the document, which is described as a “vision” for delivering health care so “everyone in the province can access seamless, integrated care no matter where they live or what care needs they have.”

No estimates of costs or savings were included in the document.

Sources said the government wants to “debureaucr­atize” the health system by eliminatin­g numerous agencies, along with their boards of directors and executive “C-suites.”

Home care and long-term care would still be locally co-ordinated under a restructur­ed health system and these sec- tors would work more closely with the hospital sector.

The idea to consolidat­e them was first raised in a report last September by consulting firm Ernst and Young, which was commission­ed by government to review provincial expenditur­es line-by-line.

Asection of the report, which called for a consolidat­ion of transfer-payment agencies, stated: “There are currently more than 20 health agencies across 11 priority areas; these organizati­ons operate independen­t of each other, and most have leadership teams and back-office functional teams.”

It went on to say that administra­tive costs could be reduced by cutting the number of service providers receiving transfer payments.

Ontario’s health system, like many in the developed world, has been criticized for being siloed. The province has long been trying to improve integratio­n of health services. A super agency could help with that, sources said.

Cancer Care Ontario has been praised in the past for its work in co-ordinating cancer services, but in more recent times it has been criticized as “bloated.” It has gone beyond its original mandate and now manages the delivery of kidney care services and participat­es in quality improvemen­t programs in the broader health system.

The Conservati­ves have long had Ontario’s 14 LHINs in their crosshairs. The agencies co-ordinate home-care services and entry into long-term-care homes. LHINs have been accused of devoting too many resources to administra­tion and not enough to front-line services.

eHealth Ontario has a tortured history. A 2009 auditor general’s report found $1billion had been spent on eHealth and its predecesso­r with little to show for it. Three years later, the auditor found that $24.4 million was spent on an electronic registry of diabetes patients that was unceremoni­ously scrapped before it was up and running.

Sources say the following transfer-payment recipients are also being eyed for inclusion in a super health agency: The Trillium Gift of Life Network, which coordinate­s organ and tissue donation and transplant­ation; Health Quality Ontario, which aims to improve the quality of health services; and CorHealth, which organizes cardiac and stroke services.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada