Toronto Star

Canadian broadcaste­rs have a legitimate axe to grind

- Twitter: @tonydwong

way back in 2017.

Netflix, of course, isn’t just disrupting legacy broadcaste­rs; it is upending the movie industry as well, taking A-list stars and plopping them on the same screen that you use to watch Jeopardy! Which, next to eating Cheez Whiz on Saltines, is as sacrilegio­us as it gets for the French.

Still, Tait has a point. Canadian broadcaste­rs have a legitimate axe to grind with Netflix.

Netflix is not required to contribute to the Canadian Media Fund, through which cable companies and broadcaste­rs help to finance original Canadian production­s.

Secondly, streaming companies don’t have to collect GST or HST sales taxes if they don’t have brick and mortar operations in the country. Meanwhile, their competitor­s have to collect that tax as well as contribute 5 per cent of their gross revenue to the Canadian Media Fund.

Netflix has said it shouldn’t pay into the fund because that would force “foreign online services to subsidize Canadian broadcaste­rs.”

Ottawa decided not to implement taxes after Netflix said it would spend at least $500 million over five years on programmin­g, a number which the company says it will exceed.

But the reality is the playing field is grossly distorted. Australia, the European Union and Japan have already moved to eliminate the competitiv­e disadvanta­ge. Quebec started requiring Netflix to collect taxes this year. So Tait isn’t far off the mark.

“So all I can say is, let us be mindful of how it is we, as Canadians, respond to global companies coming into our country,” she says.

Still, as a broadcaste­r and producer, Tait has to tread a fine line. She has to figure out how to work with the streaming giant while not being swallowed by them.

Partnering with Netflix has its advantages. Just ask the cast of CBC’s Kim’s Convenienc­e, who are now global superstars, or the makers of Citytv’s newly popular Bad Blood, which the streamer recently acquired. Netflix has become the gateway to the world for quality Canadian television.

Yet success on Netflix is a double-edged sword. Tait said “it was very painful” for her to read a Vanity Fair article thanking Netflix for Schitt’s Creek, even though it was a show that originated on the CBC.

But nothing is more revealing than the whole Bird Box controvers­y. A unanimous motion in the House of Commons asked Netflix to remove all images of the Lac-Mégantic tragedy from its fiction catalogue. The streamer used stock footage of the 2013 derailment and explosion in the Sandra Bullock thriller Bird Box and the TV series Travelers.

Netflix apologized, but has so far refused to pull the images from Bird Box. However, the producers of Travelers said they would yank the images from the show.

Perhaps the fact that Travelers is proudly co-produced by Canadians and originated on a Canadian channel made the difference. They had skin in the game. They were sensitive to the concerns in their own backyard.

That’s what Tait was trying, in a ham-fisted way, to say after all. That caravan of producers crawling north from Hollywood with a wad of cash? They don’t always have your best interests at heart, Canada.

Or put another way: “Looking at the ecosystem, everybody’s swimming in the same swimming pool,” she once said. “But some of the people aren’t cleaning it up.”

 ?? NATHAN DENETTE THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Tait said “it was very painful” for her to read an article thanking Netflix for Schitt’s Creek, even though it originated on the CBC.
NATHAN DENETTE THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO Tait said “it was very painful” for her to read an article thanking Netflix for Schitt’s Creek, even though it originated on the CBC.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada