Toronto Star

Lawyers want rights tribunal to order return of 2015 sex ed

- SHAWN JEFFORDS THE CANADIAN PRESS

Lawyers for a transgende­r girl fighting the Ontario government’s repeal of a modernized sex-ed curriculum say the document should be reinstated to protect their 11-year-old client and other LGBTQ students from discrimina­tion, at least until a new lesson plan is developed.

In closing arguments Thursday at the province’s human rights tribunal, the legal team said the government was putting the sixth-grader identified only as A Bat a disadvanta­ge by not having mandatory gender identity lessons in the current temporary curriculum.

“AB needs this informatio­n now,” her lawyer Marcus McCann said. “If this informatio­n is not taught this year there is no way to go back and teach it ... that window will have passed.”

The case before the tribunal was launched in August and focuses on the impact of the curriculum repeal on LGBTQ students.

The Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government announced last summer that it was scrapping the updated version of the curriculum brought in by the previous Liberal regime in 2015. That document included warnings about online bullying and sexting, but opponents, especially social conservati­ves, objected to the parts of the plan addressing samesex marriage, gender identity and masturbati­on.

An interim curriculum based on a version from 1998 is in place while a new lesson plan is under developmen­t.

McCann said the government’s actions, specifical­ly excluding references to gender identity in the interim curriculum, increased the risk of AB being bullied.

“This sends a message that trans people don’t exist,” he said.

McCann said the tribunal should order the government to ensure any new curriculum is compliant with Ontario’s human rights code.

Lawyers for the Ontario government argue the interim curriculum introduced last fall does not discrimina­te against students, saying teachers can expand on what’s required by the document.

Language in the introducti­on of the curriculum opens the door for them to discuss LGBTQ issues, the say.

On Thursday, lawyers for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, an intervener in the case, also asked the tribunal to order the government to reinstate the modernized curriculum while a new one is developed.

They argued that the government has discrimina­ted against AB by “erasing” mandatory references to LGBTQ people from the curriculum.

“AB has been made to feel less worthy of recognitio­n and value,” said lawyer Reema Khawja.

The commission isn’t seeking to “entrench” the 2015 curriculum as the province’s permanent sex education lesson plan, but the curriculum must comply with Ontario’s human rights code, Khawja said.

The tribunal is expected to decide on the case in the spring.

The repeal of the modernized curriculum is also being fought in a separate court challenge.

 ?? RANDY RISLING TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? Students protest the repeal of the curriculum in a mass walkout in September.
RANDY RISLING TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO Students protest the repeal of the curriculum in a mass walkout in September.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada