Toronto Star

A RARE MOVE

- JOSH RUBIN BUSINESS REPORTER How do they get approved in the first place? How often does grounding happen? Do politics enter into the grounding debate?

A look at what goes into making the decision to ground an aircraft,

As Canada joined countries around the world Wednesday in grounding the Boeing 737 Max 8, experts agree it was a rare move. It was also, they say, an example of the system working just as it should — by carefully looking at the evidence, rather than making knee-jerk decisions. Who can ground a plane?

A manufactur­er can do it. An airline could ground its fleet, if it’s concerned about safety. But it’s usually aviation authoritie­s who do it. Typically, it’s the aviation authoritie­s in the country where the plane was designed and manufactur­ed who take the lead, by revoking or temporaril­y suspending a plane’s air worthiness certificat­e. In this case, that would be the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority. But China moved first, then other major countries followed. “Each country has its own air worthiness process so they can withdraw their approval,” Appels explained. Evidence authoritie­s use can include flight data recorders, cockpit voice recorders and radar data, among others. In Canada, the Aeronautic­s Act gives the federal transport minister broad discretion to shut down particular models of planes — or other modes of transport — for safety reasons.

Aviation authoritie­s in the country where a plane is built go through a rigorous inspection process, examining the plane’s electrical, mechanical and other systems, and manufactur­ing process before issuing an air worthiness certificat­e. Then, other countries where the plane is going to be operating do their own approvals. That approval includes examining the extensive report issued by authoritie­s in the plane’s home country. “It would be the FAA for Boeing, Transport Canada for Bombardier, European Aviation Safety Authority for the Airbus and Brazil would do it for the Embraer,” former federal transporta­tion minister David Collenette said.

Very rarely. In fact, the last time Appels could recall an entire fleet of a particular model being grounded was 40 years ago when the McDonnell Douglas DC 10 was grounded in 1979, following the crash of American Airlines flight 191, which slammed into the ground shortly after takeoff from Chicago, killing 273 people. The last time Appels could recall the grounding of such a new model of plane was more than 60 years ago. The De Havilland Comet, designed and made in the U.K., was grounded after a series of fatal crashes. “This really doesn’t happen that often,” Appels said. It’s just as rare for Canada to have made the move on a U.S.-designed plane before the FAA did, Collenette said. “I can’t recall the last time Transport Canada and the minister made a decision like this without the FAA doing it first.”

Before the drastic measure of grounding takes place, aviation authoritie­s can issue safety directives for less urgent matters. “That happens a lot, and most of the time you’d have no idea it’s going on,” Appels said.

Not really, Collenette said. “The transport minister is a much more technical than political position, especially when it comes to safety,” said Collenette, who was transport minister when Swissair Flight 111 crashed in Nova Scotia and also during the attacks on the U.S. on 9/11. “People can come to you with questions, but no minister worth their salt is going to let politics affect a decision on safety.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada