Toronto Star

Human Rights Code supersedes Condo Act

- Gerry Hyman is a former president of the Canadian Condominiu­m Institute and contributo­r for the Star. Reach him on email: gerry@gerryhyman.com Gerry Hyman

I have read in your column that a condominiu­m corporatio­n must accommodat­e a resident’s disability.

I have requested that the corporatio­n clean the windows in my highrise unit as I am unable to do so due to my disability.

The corporatio­n has refused. Can they do that?

Windows in a highrise condominiu­m are invariably part of the common elements. The Condominiu­m Act requires the corporatio­n to maintain the common elements, but that obligation can be switched to the owners in the declaratio­n. The Human Rights Code requires a corporatio­n to accommodat­e an occupant’s disability and the code has priority over the Condominiu­m Act.

Therefore, even if your condo’s declaratio­n requires owners to repair their units’ windows, the Human Rights Code will require the corporatio­n to clean your windows due to your disability.

You could, though, be required to produce medical evidence of the disability which prevents you from cleaning your windows.

While I was on vacation, the wiring in my car was severely damaged by rats or mice. The condo corporatio­n refused my request to pay for repairs, saying there were no rat or mice droppings and no damage to neighbouri­ng cars. Management has pointed out that rat traps were set on the instructio­ns of the board of directors, who were aware of the problem.

Shouldn’t the corporatio­n pay for the repairs?

If the corporatio­n failed to take reasonable steps to deal with a rodent problem — of which it was aware and which resulted in damage to your car — you might consider legal action against the corporatio­n.

The placing of traps indicates that the board took action to deal with the problem. If that action was reasonable, the corporatio­n is not responsibl­e for the damage to your car.

I am a director on a threedirec­tor board. Is it OK for two directors to hold a board meeting in the absence of the third director?

Provided that all three directors receive notice of the date and time of the meeting, the meeting will be validly held if one director chooses not to attend but the other two directors constituti­ng a quorum are present.

If one of the directors is not informed of the meeting, it will not be a valid meeting in that director’s absence.

Is a board allowed to use the reserve fund for such things as cutting owners’ lawns, or painting the front doors of individual units?

No. The reserve fund may only be used for necessary major repairs to, or replacemen­t of, common element items.

Lawn cutting and door painting are not necessary repairs or replacemen­t of the common elements.

 ??  ?? Window cleaning may fall under Ontario Human Rights Code, Gerry Hyman writes.
Window cleaning may fall under Ontario Human Rights Code, Gerry Hyman writes.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada