Toronto Star

Why your doctor’s white coat may make you sick

- AUSTIN FRAKT THE NEW YORK TIMES

A recent study of patients at 10 academic hospitals in the United States found that just over half care about what their doctors wear, most of them preferring the traditiona­l white coat.

Some doctors prefer the white coat, too, viewing it as a defining symbol of the profession.

What many might not realize, though, is that health care workers’ attire — including that seemingly “clean” white coat that many prefer — can harbour dangerous bacteria and pathogens.

A systematic review of studies found that white coats are frequently contaminat­ed with strains of harmful and sometimes drug-resistant bacteria associated with hospital-acquired infections. As many as 16 per cent of white coats tested positive for methicilli­n-resistant Staphyloco­ccus aureus, and up to 42 per cent for the bacterial class Gramnegati­ve rods.

Both types of bacteria can cause serious problems, including skin and bloodstrea­m infections, sepsis and pneumonia.

It isn’t just white coats that can be problemati­c. The review also found that stethoscop­es, phones and tablets can be contaminat­ed with harmful bacteria. One study of orthopedic surgeons showed a 45 per cent match between the species of bacteria found on their ties and in the wounds of patients they had treated. Nurses’ uniforms have also been found to be contaminat­ed.

Among possible remedies, antimicrob­ial textiles can help reduce the presence of certain kinds of bacteria, according to a randomized study. Daily laundering of health care workers’ attire can help somewhat, though studies show that bacteria can contaminat­e them within hours.

Several studies of U.S. physicians found that a majority go more than a week before washing white coats. Seventeen per cent go more than a month. Several London-focused studies had similar findings pertaining both to coats and ties.

A randomized trial published last year tested whether wearing short- or long-sleeved white coats made a difference in the transmissi­on of pathogens. Consistent with previous work, the study found short sleeves led to lower rates of transmissi­on of viral DNA. It may be easier to keep hands and wrists clean when they’re not in contact with sleeves, which themselves can easily brush against other contaminat­ed objects. For this reason, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiolo­gy of America suggests clinicians consider an approach of “bare below the elbows.”

With the use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer — often more effective and convenient than soap and water — it’s far easier to keep hands clean than clothing.

 ?? THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? The defining symbol of a profession may also be teeming with harmful bacteria.
THE NEW YORK TIMES The defining symbol of a profession may also be teeming with harmful bacteria.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada